Close
The FeedEditionsJobsDonateJune Event
Philly Education News + Views Independent. Reader-Supported.
Menu
Menu
Philly Education News + Views
Independent. Reader-Supported

A look back: How Pennsylvania has distributed money for education since the 1960s

a

a

a

1960s

  • william 20scranton3

There were 2,277 school districts in Pennsylvania. Under Gov. William W. Scranton, a series of consolidations reduced the number of districts to fewer than 700 (it fell to 505 by the late 1970s).

1966

The school code specified that the state would shoulder 50 percent of total educational costs. The state introduced the Basic Instructional Subsidy, which multiplied each district’s enrollment by an “aid ratio” (a factor reflecting the district’s wealth), and then by the state average cost per student. The calculations got more complex in later years, with “add-ons” for such factors as poverty and density. Also introduced was the concept of “minimum subsidy” – all districts, however wealthy, were guaranteed some aid.

1975

  • state 20capitol

The commonwealth reached its peak contribution to school costs – 55 percent. It maintained at least a 50 percent ratio until 1976, when it slipped below that.

1983

The legislature replaced the Basic Instructional Subsidy with the Equalized Subsidy for Basic Education. ESBE removed the 50 percent state obligation and revised how each district’s base subsidy per student was calculated, adding a factor measuring local tax effort. It kept the add-ons for poverty and density, and included more, such as one for small, rural districts.

1980s

More revisions to ESBE had a big impact on the distribution of state aid. A “hold-harmless” provision said that no district would get less than a 2 percent increase each year and no district would get an increase above 7.45 percent. These changes hurt poor districts while benefiting wealthier ones.

1991

The Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small Schools (PARSS) filed a lawsuit saying that the state’s distribution formula was unconstitutional.

1993

ESBE, with all its built-in inequities, was abandoned. From that year forward, state aid increases were distributed through special supplements that changed every year and were sometimes targeted to specific districts. Districts no longer got adjustments based on changes in student population, unless through a “growth” supplement.

1997

The state charter law was passed, along with a detailed formula on how money would be driven to these independently run, tax-funded schools.

1997-98

  • davidhornbeck

 

The Philadelphia School District, under Superintendent David Hornbeck, filed a lawsuit in Commonwealth Court claiming that the state funding formula was unconstitutional. In 1998, Hornbeck filed a federal lawsuit, alleging that the state funding formula discriminated against students of color and violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.

1999

After eight years of litigation, the state Supreme Court upheld a Commonwealth Court decision that denied the PARSS claim. On the same day, it threw out Philadelphia’s state lawsuit.

2001

Citing fiscal distress, the state took over the Philadelphia School District, establishing the School Reform Commission. The District’s federal lawsuit was withdrawn.

2005

 

  • rendell

Gov. Edward Rendell introduced Accountability Block Grants as a way to direct additional state aid for targeted purposes, including early childhood education and tutoring.

2007

  • costing out study

 

The state released a “costing-out study” ordered by the legislature that evaluated each of the 500 districts, estimating the cost of providing all students with an adequate education. It set spending goals for each district and a state aid formula to work toward those goals. The study said that $4.4 billion more in spending was required for all districts to reach adequacy, $1 billion of that for Philadelphia.

2008

Gov. Rendell’s administration used the costing-out study to guide state aid distribution until 2010. The administration proposed a six-year plan to increase the state share from about 35 to 55 percent. It used money from the federal stimulus to substitute for some of the state aid.

2011

 

  • corbett

The Corbett administration abandoned the formula established by the costing-out study. When federal stimulus money dried up, aid from Harrisburg dropped, and districts started raising local taxes and cutting programs.

Get the Notebook in your inbox

Notes from the news
Weekly newsletter
Promotions

Recent Articles

District is pressed to disclose health data on every school after mold outbreaks Notes from the news - October 20 Was Thursday the beginning of the end for the SRC? Notes from the news - October 19 (2) Adaire officially opens its new green schoolyard