The FeedEditionsJobsDonateJune Event
Philly Education News + Views Independent. Reader-Supported.
Philly Education News + Views
Independent. Reader-Supported

State can't dismiss complaints filed by Philly school parents




Commonwealth Court has ruled that the state cannot dismiss complaints about inadequate conditions in Philadelphia District schools that opened and operated under a "doomsday budget" adopted in 2013, if they pertain to curriculum flaws.

The ruling involved a suit filed by the Public Interest Law Center on behalf of seven parents and Parents United for Public Education against Pennsylvania's former acting education secretary, Carolyn Dumaresq. The plaintiffs argued the state failed in its duty to consider and investigate "curriculum deficiencies" after massive budget reductions that cut Philadelphia schools to the bone.

Through the website, 825 complaints were filed alleging an array of issues: overcrowded classrooms, a lack of art, music, foreign languages, and physical education in the curriculum, shortages in staffing (including teachers, guidance counselors, librarians, administrators, and aides), and unsafe or unsanitary conditions.

The state argued that the plaintiffs' complaints were non-curricular, and so the Department of Education was not required to look into them.  

Judges for the court concluded that issues about building conditions and staffing shortages were not, as Dumaresq argued, curriculum matters. These complaints, therefore, do not require investigation.

"Upon review, the Secretary’s interpretation of curriculum ... is not erroneous or inconsistent with the regulations," the judges wrote in their opinion.

But the loss of instructional courses or reduction to them, the court said, were matters to be investigated and corrected, if necessary. "Unlike facility or staffing concerns, these allegations directly pertain to curriculum as that term is defined."

Tim Allen, one of the plaintiffs, had filed a complaint because his child's high school, Bodine, had stopped offering four years of foreign languages, despite the school's focus on international affairs. 

"PDE wrote back and said they wouldn’t do anything about it because it was a ‘local matter.’ I hope that after today’s decision, PDE will finally fulfill its mandate to oversee the public schools,” said Allen.

Amy Laura Cahn, an attorney with the Public Interest Law Center, said the ruling should encourage parents to continue reporting complaints about curriculum deficiencies.

"It indicates that if they have similar allegations going into this next school year, that we'd encourage them to file them through" 


Correction: A previous version of this story incorrectly implied that the Pennsylvania Department of Education was ordered to investigate complaints about curriculum deficiencies associated with the lawsuit.

Get the Notebook in your inbox

Notes from the news
Weekly newsletter

Recent Articles

Mifflin students protest split-grade classroom plan and get new teacher Journeys to the United States A glossary of terms, resources for English learners How schools teach English amid other lessons Language obstacles can be conquered

David Limm

David is a former online editor of the Notebook.

Philly public schools, post a pic of staff or students reading the Notebook on our FB page!

The first 40 schools to post a pic and tell us why the Notebook is important will receive 100 of our new water bottles

Click here for info