The FeedEditionsJobsDonateJune Event
Philly Education News + Views Independent. Reader-Supported.
Menu
Menu
Philly Education News + Views
Independent. Reader-Supported

SRC approves policy for gender-nonconforming students

In last meeting of school year, it also takes action on several charter matters and codifies the role of School Advisory Councils.
newsworks
  • src meeting jan bas slabbers
    Bastiaan Slabbers / NewsWorks

a

a

a

The School District of Philadelphia approved a sweeping policy Thursday that allows transgender students to use the bathroom and locker room of their choosing, but goes beyond that.

The new policy, voted on by the School Reform Commission on Thursday night, codifies a number of rights for transgender and gender-nonconforming students. They include:

  • The right to be addressed using their preferred name and gender pronoun.
  • The right to use the restroom and locker room that “corresponds to their gender identity."
  • The right to participate in physical education classes and intramural sports in a manner consistent with their gender identity.
  • The right to dress in alignment with their gender identity.

The policy also mandates that schools make single-stall restrooms and private changing areas available for students who feel “a need or desire for increased privacy.” It further instructs schools to use as much “gender-neutral language” as possible in all communications and limit the number of gender-segregated activities.

On the matter of interscholastic sports, the policy says any disputes will be resolved “case-by-case.”

Given the usual hubbub around transgender policies, the commission’s actions came with notably little attention. Only one of the more than 20 registered public speakers at the SRC meeting even mentioned it. The resolution passed with the unanimous consent of all four commissioners present, and there was no discussion among the commissioners.

The District’s new policy comes just a month after the U.S. Department of Education issued guidance to school districts on transgender students. In a “Dear Colleague” letter, the department informed local districts that they could be in violation of Title IX guidelines if they discriminated against transgender students by denying them use of the bathroom or locker room that corresponds to their gender identity.

“We have worked closely with students and members of the LGBTQ community to develop these guidelines,” said Superintendent William Hite in a statement. “Every student deserves to know their rights will be recognized and upheld at school. This policy provides clear guidance and will help ensure that our schools remain welcoming to all our students.”

Karyn Lynch, the District’s director of student support services, said that the policy was in the works long before the Obama directive, hammered out in a nearly yearlong process that included consultations with members of Hite’s student advisory group.

“In a lot of our schools, this will be formalizing practices that already exist,” she said.

She could not guess how many gender-nonconforming students are now attending District schools, but said that officials have had “maybe 30 calls in seven years” over issues such as whether it is possible to change a student’s name on school records due to a gender transition. More generally, some parents would call to ask whether there were any concerns they should raise in sending their gender-nonconforming children to school.

The policy explicitly states that students should use the restrooms and locker rooms that conform with their “gender identity,” but Lynch said that, on occasion, restrooms with more privacy, like those in the nurse’s office, have been made available to students who asked for them.

Hite’s student advisory group included 8th through 12th graders from both District and charter schools. Lynch did not know whether any transgender students were represented, but said it was a diverse group and the issue inspired lively discussions.  

“The students talked openly and honestly,” she said. “The superintendent took all their recommendations and suggestions under consideration.”

The School Reform Commission also passed a resolution Thursday setting the stage for converting Kenderton Elementary, one of its Renaissance charter schools, back into a District-run school. Kenderton was left in the lurch when its charter operator, Young Scholars, announced in May that it could no longer afford to run the school because of its large special-education population. Kenderton parents pushed for the Mastery Charter network to take over the school, but Mastery wanted to change the school’s grade configuration. Such a change would have required the approval of the SRC, which balked at the request.

Asked why, Commissioner Bill Green said that a majority of SRC members felt it would have set poor precedent to grant a charter and then change the terms before the charter expired. Green clarified, however, that he would have supported a grade reconfiguration.

Kenderton’s board still needs to surrender the school’s charter before the School District can officially take control. The head of the District’s charter school office, DawnLynne Kacer, indicated that the charter surrender is forthcoming.

“We have been in constant communications with [Kenderton’s board], and they have verbally told us that they are willing and intend to surrender the charter,” said Kacer.

As of press time, a spokesperson for the Kenderton board could not confirm its position.

SRC staff also withdrew, just hours before the meeting, planned renewal resolutions for three Mastery Charter schools. The District presented Mastery Clymer, Simon Gratz, and Shoemaker for renewal months ago, Kacer said, but Mastery hasn’t signed the renewal agreements yet. Kacer said the District and Mastery continue to negotiate the terms of the renewals, but would not describe the nature of substance of those negotiations. Officials from Mastery could not be reached for comment.

The District also adopted a policy codifying the role of School Advisory Councils, school-based bodies that are made up of parents, community members and older students meant to encourage community input. The policy mandates that all schools have an “active and engaged” SAC, except those that already have some other organization filling a similar role.

The policy specifies how SACs should be formed and details their duties. It says SACs should scrutinize school budgets, examine data on school performance, collaborate with school principals, review school policies, and “play an active role” in determining the initiatives and programs their schools undertake. It does not, however, grant any firm authority to SACs, placing them largely in an oversight role. A few speakers at the meeting argued that the policy didn't go far enough and should grant the SAC real decision-making power.

For years the District has flirted with the idea of beefing up School Advisory Councils, and they’ve been cast as an important cog in Mayor Kenney’s new community schools initiative.

The SRC also approved the four-year pact with the District's 2,000 blue-collar workers, represented by 32BJ SEIU, which was ratified by the membership earlier this week. Ernie Bennett, president of 32BJ, was in the audience and acknowledged by the commissioners. The workers include bus drivers, bus attendants, maintenance workers, cleaners, and building engineers.

Hite expressed disappointment that the Commonwealth Association of School Administrators, the bargaining unit representing principals, administrators and some administrative workers, rejected its tentative pact. He said he was meeting with small groups of principals "to understand from their perspective some of the issues we need to talk about."

In addition to salary increases, the agreement included a lump sum bonus if the pact were signed by the end of June, which now could be in jeopardy. Objections were not due to the financial package, but rather to conditions in schools that principals are working under given the District's fiscal austerity.  

"The principals acknowledged that the circumstances are difficult for them," Hite said.

The SRC also approved several resolutions regarding individual charter schools.

For Pan American charter, it approved an enrollment increase by seven seats for the next school year and 26 in 2017-18, which will bring the K-8 school to a maximum of 750 students. But it attached several conditions, including that the charter’s board regularly post the dates, times, and places of its meetings, end the practice of requiring parents to attend an event or complete an assessment before finalizing student enrollment, and submit a financial audit by the end of the year.

It formally approved a three-year charter for KIPP West Philadelphia for grades K-4 and approved merging the school with West Philadelphia Prep Charter, now a grade 5-8 middle school. It has also agreed to an attendance zone for new students in the next three years.

It also passed an amendment to the charter for TECH Freire Charter school so that it offers admissions preference to students in the Strawberry Mansion catchment area.

 

Get the Notebook in your inbox

Notes from the news
Weekly newsletter
Promotions

Related Articles

District policy about transgender students goes beyond bathroom access In latest twist, Kenderton may return to District control KIPP: Making the most of extra time SRC pushes for stronger school advisory councils

Attention Teachers: FREE Exercise Class at Your School!

LEARN MORE