Please Join Today!
view counter

New SRC Gets a D for Participation in Class

By Eric Braxton on Apr 16, 2009 04:46 PM

Yesterday was an important meeting for the School Reform Commission.  It was the first meeting for new chairman Robert Archie and new member Johnny Irizarry.  It was also the presentation of the final draft of the District’s new strategic plan, Imagine 2014.  I don’t want to rush to judgment too soon, but I hope we will see more engagement from SRC members in the future.
As Mensah Dean reported in the Daily News, only one commissioner asked a question about the strategic plan.  In addition, Mr. Archie appeared to be reading every word he spoke from a script.  I will give him some latitude since it was his first day on the job, but I have been in many meetings where District officials have criticized students for reading from prepared comments (insinuating that their comments must have been written by adults).  What does it mean when the chairman of the SRC does this?
My biggest concern was the lack of engagement with the strategic plan.  Here we are about to pass a document that dictates the direction of our School District for the next five years and only one commissioner has a question? Really? This is the kind of thing that deserves serious attention.

Are they not paying attention or do they just understand everything in the plan perfectly?  We have no way of knowing.  Now it is possible that other commissioners asked their questions in private, not wanting to create public tension with the administration, but I believe that public discussion on matters like the future of public education in our city is a good thing.  Good teachers encourage their students to be critical thinkers and to ask tough questions.  Shouldn’t we expect the same from SRC members?

I raise this concern not because I think the strategic plan is bad and needs to be scrutinized, but because I believe the role of the SRC is to ensure that the School District is accountable to the public.  Simply rubber-stamping the administration’s proposals without so much as a question is a disservice to the citizens of Philadelphia.  Again, it is possible that they are asking tough questions behind closed doors, but if they don’t do it in public, how do we know they are doing it at all?  The public needs some assurances that the people who have been chosen to lead our school system understand the issues and are on the job.       

The future of our city relies on dramatically improving the quality of our public schools, but there are many different ideas about how to do that.  I believe that in order to bring about change we need to encourage public discussion and debate.  Students and parents need to hold their schools accountable for providing high quality education.  If we want students and parents to be more active in taking ownership over their schools, the SRC needs to model that kind of active engagement.  I hope that in the future, SRC members will be leaders in sparking rigorous, challenging, and respectful debate of the issue at hand.  Our young people deserve it.

Click Here
view counter

Comments (2)

Submitted by Paul Socolar on April 16, 2009 8:53 pm

Commissioner Heidi Ramirez was the one commissioner to ask questions in public session yesterday. Eric was not the only audience member left scratching his head about the SRC response to the first opportunity to ask questions publicly on the "final" five-year plan.

As Eric points out, we have no way of knowing what happened in yesterday's SRC executive session. Typically, SRC members have met behind closed doors in executive session for several hours prior to the public meeting. But yesterday SRC members were not seen arriving at 440 N. Broad till about noon, not leaving a lot of time to review the plan and their meeting agenda. It's unlikely that this just-released 66-page document received any lengthy discussions in private session.

It's worth noting that like the rest of us, SRC members may not have had much more than 24 hours to review the document prior to the meeting, and they do all hold down other jobs. The press did not as far as I know get to ask the three quiet commissioners whether they'd had a chance to read and digest the new plan thoroughly.

Submitted by Wendy Harris on April 20, 2009 9:15 am

I too agree that it does seem odd that only one commissioner had questions regarding Imagine 2014. Commissioner Ramirez asked some very important questions that so many of us wanted answers to - particularly about the price tag for implementing such an important and ambitious document. Each time Commissioner Ramirez asked a question I felt sorry for her because to me she was made to feel as though it was somehow inappropriate to pose any questions about the plan. I applaud her for speaking up when none of the other commissioners did - at least not in a public forum - and hope that her continued outspokenness about the issues and matters that come before the SRC inspire the rest of the members (particularly those who are new to the commission) to challenge and dialogue with one another in a way that moves the District forward in a positive and productive way.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

Read the latest print issue

Philly Ed Feed

Recent Comments


Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy