Blowing a huge hole in the District budget
by Paul Socolar on Sep 12 2009 Posted in Eye on the budget
Philadelphia Inquirer reporter Dan Hardy writes Saturday that with the proposed Harrisburg budget agreement, the Philadelphia school district will fall at least $144 million short in state aid this year compared to what was in the budget plan of Gov. Rendell. The governor is still threatening to veto the proposed agreement.
According to today's story, the massive $144 million gap would result from a decision to scale back the increase in the state basic education subsidy ($300 million statewide instead of $418 million) and more significantly, a redirection of federal stimulus ("fiscal stabilization") dollars that Rendell had planned to send directly to school districts. The $144 million blow to Philadelphia could grow even larger if the state cuts other funding streams such as Accountability Block Grants, HeadStart, or Pre-K Counts.
The governor is expected to fight the legislature's plans to cut funding for pre-K programs. District Chief Business Officer Michael Masch told the Inquirer that it is too early to know the impact of the state's budget on the District.
The District budget for 2009-10 incorporated the projected revenue increases in the Rendell budget plan, which were expected to boost School District revenues by an unprecedented $307 million, or 11 percent. These anticipated funds were to be entirely devoted to a variety of new and recurring expense items in the current school year, and some have already been spent on items like summer school, class size reduction, and new counselors.
[The Notebook reported in May on how this anticipated $300 million infusion was slated to be spent. One large chunk, the $126 million in Year 1 initiatives of the Imagine 2014 strategic plan, is detailed in the District's "Budget in Brief" document.]
Privately, District officials have been discussing for weeks the possibility of a budget shortfall in the range of $150 million, according to District sources. That would be the approximate result if Republicans and the Rendell administration resolved their deadlock on education aid by meeting each other halfway. Publicly, Superintendent Ackerman has stated only that the District has been holding off on some spending until the deadlock is resolved.
By comparison, the "surprise" budget shortfall that hit the District in fall 2006 amounted to $73 million. One difference this year is that the current year's budget includes dozens of new initiatives, some of which can still be taken off the table before they are launched.
As was evidenced in 2006, the School Reform Commission and the public can insist on making these midyear budget-cutting decisions via an open public process, though the District is not required to do so.
Perhaps as a harbinger of the types of issues and battles that are to come, local advocates are reporting that the District has taken steps to cut hundreds of slots from the new alternative programs for returning dropouts that were slated to start this year. The Notebook has confirmed that some providers whose contracts were authorized by the School Reform Commission in June have been notified that the District will be reducing or eliminating their slots.
On Friday, the District did not respond to requests for comment on plans to cut alternative programs. The District would save about $1 million for every 100 slots eliminated.
Alternative education providers approved for this year include The Big Picture Company, Camelot Schools of Pennsylvania, Communities in Schools, Community Education Partners, Abraxas Education Group, International Education and Community Initiatives (IECI), Ombudsman Inc., Opportunities Industrialization Centers of America (OIC), Unique Education Experience Inc. (Delaware Valley High School), and Youth Empowerment Services (YES). Not all have experienced cuts.







Comments (6)
Submitted by Who will Arlene sue next? (not verified) on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 08:48.
The budget is important but this contract is not all about money. Money is the districts smokescreen for not making real improvements in the education environment. Teachers want respect and will demand it in this contract. I expect the district will do little to offer it and therein lies the impasse. Teachers will hold both the PFT and the District accountable for respect. Without it all parties lose, especially the students who are treated like drones forced to endure the illegitimate behavior of those with unmet emotional needs.
Submitted by anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 09:10.
Arlene...the district and the union are two peas in the same pod...your namesake "respects" and is "highly pleased" with her partner, who is the head of the union...they work hand in glove...they are two partners in er, um, ah, er...education...
Submitted by Hilary (not verified) on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 12:45.
Good for Rendell. Glad to see him drawing the line. Some rich lady's new designer handbag should NOT take precedence over food, shelter or medicine for some poor person. If you have the money for luxury goods, it should instead be spent on providing necessities to Americans. Once everyone's needs are met, then it can be designer handbag time. Until then, tax the rich.
Submitted by anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 15:38.
Hilary, power to the people...the handbag reference, are you refering to $500,000 a year, Arlene Ackerman?
Submitted by Paul Socolar on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 15:53.
The governor's remarks on Saturday appeared to focus on staving off cuts to additional education line items like pre-K, full day kindergarten, afterschool tutoring, and grants to reduce class size. He argued that while the legislature has endorsed his call to preserve an increase in the basic education subsidy ($300 million statewide), it is wrong to at the same time introduce proposals to cut $147 million from other education line items.
But the biggest blows to Philadelphia appear to be a done deal - the loss of stimulus money and the downward adjustment in the basic education subsidy. If the governor is sucessful at fighting off the other cuts, the damage to Philadelphia might stay in the range of $150 million ... still an awful scenario to have to deal with after the school year has already opened.
Submitted by Who will Arlene sue next? (not verified) on Sun, 09/13/2009 - 22:00.
It's awful we have close minded administrators clueless as to what it takes to work successfully with children who come to school academically malnourished. What can Arlene do besides blame the teacher. Oh yeah, she can sue the state.
The poor women is hapless, not enough money, bad teachers, has to find someone else to manage the difficult schools.
Maybe we can invest Leroy Nunnery's 90K into providing more read 180 programs for kids that need it. That $500 per child the EMOs get can go to Reading Recovery or Visiting Nurse's program, programs that we know work, but hey we can just imagine what she would have done if she had more money.
Post new comment