Menu
Paid Advertisement
view counter

Were our schools designed to succeed?

By Eric Braxton on Jan 22, 2010 11:24 AM

A lot of people are talking these days about the failure of public schools. They cite astronomical dropout rates, low test scores, and a host of other alarming statistics. I want to suggest another perspective. Our schools are actually quite successful at doing what they were designed to do.

“The large comprehensive high school was conceived at the beginning of the twentieth century to fit an industrial society. These schools were originally expected to be a sorting mechanism for an economy that had a place for students who did not graduate. They were not intended to educate all students to the level of college readiness and the system has always done a grave disservice to some children and communities.”

-Choosing Small: The Essential Guide to Successful High School Conversion by Jay Feldman, M. Lisette Lopex, and Katherine G. Simon

“We have inherited a form of education that is sedimentary in nature. It has a 19th century structure, overlaid by 20th century aspirations about equality and opportunity, with the expectation that it should produce 21st century outcomes. It has been remarkably successful for the chaos of its design, but I believe it no longer serves the public's interests personally, nationally or globally.”

-Steve Jubb

Our system of secondary education was designed to support a 19th century industrial economy. It aims to identify a small number of students to go on to college, while the rest are sorted out for industrial jobs, farming, the military, or worse. While it can be debated whether this was ever a good model of education, it certainly does not suit our current society in which there are very few decent jobs that do not require a college education.

Philadelphia’s high school system was clearly designed based on this model. The elite magnet schools have long prepared the selected few for college, while neighborhood schools prepared some for industrial jobs and others for the military, unemployment, or prison. (There has, of course, always been a small group of highly motivated students who have made it out of neighborhood schools and through college.)

Some people will argue that there was a golden age of public education (it usually happened whenever they were in high school). School reformer and author Deborah Meier debunked this myth in a recent blog:

“my colleague, literary critic Irving Howe, was indignant when I told him 'we' intended to close his old alma mater, James Monroe High School, over the next four years while opening new small schools to serve the same population. It currently graduated, I told him, only 27 percent of its incoming freshmen. He swore to me that in his day Monroe graduated nearly all its students. I looked up the data. It was way under 50 percent. 'It can't be,' insisted Irving. 'Everyone I knew graduated.' Ah ha! Everyone he knew.”

If we are serious about creating truly great high schools, we must recognize that our present system was not designed to work for everyone. 

A system that was fundamentally designed to educate only a small percentage of the population cannot simply be reformed. It must be radically transformed. We do not need a few reforms here or there, but rather a reconstruction of the whole purpose of schools. So much education reform these days amounts to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Some basic tenets of this system will have to be abandoned as we ask ourselves, what will it take to educate all young people?   

view counter

Comments (2)

Submitted by Philly HS Teacher (not verified) on January 24, 2010 3:25 pm

Thanks for raising the issue. I don't know the answer - and don't know if anyone does. The tracked (magnet, selective versus comprehensive) school system is so entrenched in Philly. How many parents of students at magnet schools will send their teens to a neighborhood school? How many teachers at magnet schools will go back to a comprehensive school?

This year we are told "Corrective Reading/Math" are the solutions. There are also aspects of Talent Development. None of these address a desire to be at school. There are charters with different models but can they be replicated with every and all students? (e.g. look at the percentage of students with an IEP in comprehensive high schools versus magnets; charters, in general, have higher numbers but not like most neighborhood schools)

Submitted by T.Pullins (not verified) on February 9, 2010 8:13 pm

I commend E. Braxton for the point he has made about comprehensive high schools - as a parent I learned (the hard way) that the high school my son attends had no intention of educating/equipping him for the next level of education. If fact many of the adults at his school are outwardly suprised when he has shared with them that his parents have given him no choice that college was not a option he'll will take that step upon graduation.
The entire Philadelphia School Systems needs to be "TRANSFORMED" not REFORMED-- we're in the year of 2010 and every child should be treated with the expectation that College is the next step and that high school is not the end of their acadamic careers. This way, even if some don't make it to college -- they're equipped with a strong foundation that will enable them to suceed in this techological and diverse world. When will we stop allowing the bar of education to be lowered? Sometimes is ok to leave a child behind, in order for him/her to catch up and not miss what's needed to take the next step forward. Comprehensive, Charter, Special Admit and Magnets schools should all have the same basic standards. EDUCATE.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

               

Read the latest print issue

 

Philly Ed Feed

Become a Notebook member

 

Recent Comments

Top

Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300
notebook@thenotebook.org

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy