Menu
Paid Advertisement
view counter

How big is the central office?

By Paul Socolar on May 22, 2010 11:22 PM

The size of the School District's central office appears to be pretty much of a moving target in recent budget documents.

A current breakdown from the District's budget book shows that the District's "administrative support functions" grew from $117 million in 2008-09 to $198 million in the current year, a surprising one-year increase of 70 percent (see p. 98). The same statement shows the full-time administrative staff growing from 896 positions in December 2007, pre-Ackerman, to 1135 today.

As recently as last November, however, a "budget in brief" document for this very year showed an administrative support budget that was $52 million smaller than the current figure - or only $146 million. According to that version, administrative expenses were up from $128 million in 2008-09 - only a 14 percent increase.

How do we explain these wildly different figures? How did we get from $117 million to $198 million in one year? Is money is being shifted from schools to central office?

The District has not made budget officials available to the Notebook for an interview on the subject.

What makes these comparisons difficult is that definitions change about what is included in "administrative support operations." Recategorization of certain expenditures and staff positions could account for much of the change. It looks like since last November, that happened with the Office of Specialized Services to the tune of $25-30 million dollars that didn't used to show up as administrative costs.

Even when it's real, growth in central office is not necessarily a bad thing - bear in mind the recent calls for the District to bolster its charter school oversight or to expand its Re-engagement Center. But it's something politicians and others are always asking about.

In recent budget documents, the shift in the number of full-time positions in administrative support in fiscal years 2009, 2010, and 2011 has been less pronounced than the fluctuation in in the spending figures. The number of administrative staff during that period has seemed to vary around 1100, plus or minus 60. But that is still a far cry from 896 before Ackerman's arrival.

Whatever may be the causes of these fluctuations, page 98 of the budget book certainly merits some explanation before next Wednesday's School Reform Commission budget vote. When we get some answers, we will share them with you.

For a still dense but more accessible set of figures about the District's administrative support operations, see pages 27-28 the "budget in brief."

 

view counter

Comments (4)

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on May 23, 2010 9:28 am

Central office growth IS A BAD THING when the school district is not testing kids for special ed., breaking the law by failing to give ESL students two hours a day tutoring by ESL teachers (instead of two hours a week!), when there are no accomodation rooms to contain troublemakers that the school district refuses to handle, missing text books, etc.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on May 23, 2010 11:11 am

Wow. Nothing surprises me anymore. It's a tragedy and it's borderline criminal. Notebook, you have been a BLESSING this year in your reporting. You are fearlessas you aren't afraid to ask what others won't. I beg of you to KEEP ON IT! Do not let up...

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on May 23, 2010 11:06 am

Of course, money keeps shifting from the schools to 440, Arlene needs to be rewarded with Bonuses for all this outstanding service she brings to our fair city.

Submitted by Jonny Rashid (not verified) on May 23, 2010 3:09 pm

Most research indicates centralization is not the answer to public schools; it's no surprise that Arlene Ackerman's administration does the opposite.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

Read the latest print issue

Philly Ed Feed

Become a Notebook member

 

Recent Comments

Top

Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300
notebook@thenotebook.org

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy