Menu
Paid Advertisement
view counter

What can the president's words of encouragement mean for students?

Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/4456682734/

President Obama reiterated that message in his speech at Masterman.

Standing at the podium in front of a blue background emblazoned with the words “My Education, My Future,” President Barack Obama delivered his second back-to-school speech in front of 600 students at Julia R. Masterman High School.

For 20 minutes Obama talked to the wide-eyed students – chosen randomly from the total student population of 1,205 to sit in the auditorium to hear the speech while the rest of the students listened in their classes via live Web stream – about education being the key to success and the importance of working hard, staying focused, and embracing challenges.

As I sat in the packed auditorium I wondered why he chose to deliver his inspirational message of hard work and hope for the future at this particular school, already a shining example of a school doing great things. I wondered what students thought about Obama’s choice, and if they were thinking what I was thinking – that maybe Obama should have delivered his educational pep talk to students at an underperforming school. After all, aren’t they the ones who need it most? 

And so I asked.

Kelly Ca, a senior and Masterman’s student body president, said that she was surprised that the President chose her school for his remarks “for the sheer fact that it is a small school and I know that a lot of people outside of Philadelphia don’t know about it, but I know that with Masterman’s reputation…Masterman is a great school and Barrack Obama’s choice wasn’t a bad one at all.”

Veri Seo, a 12th grader who already has her sights set on going to graduate school, said “it was a very nice surprise,” and that even though “as a Masterman student we already have a lot of motivation from our ourselves, teachers, friends, and each other, it catapulted our level of motivation even further.”

I, like Kelly Ca, don’t think Obama’s choice was a bad choice, I’m just not sure it was the best choice. Why deliver this speech to a school that has a 99 percent four-year graduation rate; a school where 98 percent of the students scored proficient in reading on the 2009 PSSAs and 100 percent scored proficient in math; a school where in 2009 there was only one out of school suspension, and a school where average daily attendance is almost 100 percent? Judging from the data, these students are already doing all the things that Obama instructed them to do in his remarks.

That’s not to say that students already on the right track and headed for college – students like Kelly Ca, who plans to study pre-med and has applied to Harvard and University of Pennsylvania - don’t need words of encouragement to motivate them to keep pressing toward their goals. We all need positive reinforcement.

But as I was sitting among tomorrow’s leaders and possibly a future president, I couldn’t help but wonder how much more of an impression the President’s appearance and speech would have made on students at Overbrook, Sayre, South Philadelphia, Vaux, West Philadelphia, or several other of the District’s schools where four-year graduation rates are far below 50 percent and test scores are frighteningly low.

I can’t help but wonder what hard exteriors would have been softened because the President stopped by to tell them that they too can make it despite obstacles in their schools and communities. Imagine how the walls that so many struggling students in underperforming schools put up may have crumbled if Obama stepped off the stage at one of these schools – as he did at Masterman after his speech – to shake students’ hands, give a warm smile, and a few kind words.

Granted, the speech was streamed on the Web for anyone with Internet access to see and District teachers were encouraged through a letter sent out by Superintendent Ackerman the day before to watch the speech with their classes. But there’s just something to be said for having the leader of the free world standing right in your auditorium telling you face-to-face that “the farther you go in school, the farther you’ll go in life”, and then sharing with you that even he, growing up, faced uncertain times in his academics, was raised in a single parent household without a father, and struggled with his identity having been the child of biracial parents.

Imagine what those words ringing out over a podium at King, FitzSimons, Benjamin Franklin, or Germantown would have meant to the student thinking about dropping out, the student who has faced multiple suspensions and now possible expulsion, the student who has been truant for more days than he has been in class, or the student who wants to go to college but feels its unattainable because no one in his family even graduated from high school let alone a university.  

Obama did veer away from his prepared remarks slightly at one point in his speech to say:

“I’m sort of preaching to the choir here because I know that’s the kind of culture of excellence that you promote at Masterman. But I’m not just speaking only to you. I’m speaking to kids all across the country and I want them to all hear that message...this is the kind of excellence that we have to promote in all of America’s schools.”

Of course, excellence should be promoted in every school across the nation and yesterday students across the country had the opportunity to hear how their futures depend on what they do in the classroom today. I just wish President Obama had chosen to deliver this message from a school attended by those students who need to hear it the most.

view counter

Comments (7)

Submitted by yohahn (not verified) on September 15, 2010 9:27 pm

So at a non-Magnate school, the Vice-Principal tells all the teachers, hurry, go to your classrooms and watch President Obama's speech on the TV in your classroom. As we headed to our classrooms to turn on our TV sets, we all realize, no converter box, only digial signals, only white fuzz.

Submitted by Erika Owens (not verified) on September 16, 2010 11:08 am

That's interesting. I'm not sure if the speech was even broadcast on TV anyhow. There was definitely a webstream, but that raises another question--do all schools have setups that would allow students in every classroom to watch a webstream broadcast?

I wonder if this speech highlighted any computer or Internet access issues.

Submitted by anonymous (not verified) on September 18, 2010 9:08 pm

My school did not watch the speech. I doubt we have the technology. We certainly do NOT have it in every classroom. If I ever have the capability, I will show it in my classroom. Would have been nice to watch it with the rest of the nation. I read excerpts from the speech the next day, and kids hung on every word.

Submitted by NancyLee Bergey (not verified) on September 16, 2010 3:54 pm

Of course, like everyone else, I wondered about the choice of Masterman. But I think we may be taking a too "Philadelphia-centric" view of this. The President was, after all, speaking to a national, or perhaps even an international audience. He picked one school in the country. If you are going to go to the trouble to identify Blue Ribbon Schools, it seems sensible that you would want to make your speech at one of them. So on the national scale what is perhaps more important is that President Obama chose an urban public school. He could have chosen Devon Elementary (Devon, PA), after all, or a school in Wyoming.

It is disappointing and distressing to read the comment above about Philadelphia schools not having adequate facilities to have watched this speech. All of the students in Philadelphia should have had the chance to see the speech, to enjoy the fact that the President was speaking in their city, and to be inspired by his words. I am sure that all high school students could appreciate hearing the President acknowledge that,'"being a teenager isn't easy," and to put this into very personal terms of his own search for identify. Students in many parts of our city could resonate with a descriptions of the kind of family responsibilities many urban youth shoulder that was also part of this speech. Clearly, President Obama was not speaking primarily to Masterman students.

Finally, in addition to the quote above, which recognized that Masterman students are already rising to the challenges the President was presenting, the speech included a reference to a letter from Tamara Robinson, a student who wrote to the President to say, among other things, "I try to work hard to meet my goals and to help others to meet their goals. That is how the world should work." That is a great message for Masterman students, and for a lot of the rest of us.

Submitted by Philly High School Teacher (not verified) on September 16, 2010 4:12 pm

We have no such technology at my school. My students missed the speech. In fact, a few students of mine asked why did he pick Masterman answered "that's where the advanced students are, you know, the smart kids." Sorry we weren't good enough at Kensington.

Submitted by Renaissanced (not verified) on September 18, 2010 12:52 am

This speech would have meant more to many different people if the President had given it at a comprehensive high school, where some students would have felt inspired to heed his advice. Oh well, the elite get their glory, and those of us in the trenches get to dig on and try and hope for the best.

Submitted by Anon and anon (not verified) on September 19, 2010 11:07 am

I can see both sides of this question.

On one side, why shouldn't the students at Masterman be "rewarded" by having the President speak to their school? Why shouldn't other students SEE that hard work and good choices lead to good things like this visit? Besides, I am not sure that the students at some of these neighborhood schools could have controlled their behavior for this event. ['YOU GOT TO SIT IN FRONT?? NOT FAIR! (insert brawl here)' or 'YO, BARACK, YOUR WIFE IS HOT!' shouted at a quiet moment.] I know that not all or even most of the students are like this, but from what I've seen in these schools, impulse control is not a strong point and it would only take ONE student like this to create a major fiasco, which would be embarrassing for the whole city. I'm guessing that trust in the behavior of the student body was a big reason why Masterman was chosen.

On the other side, it would have been nice to see students at a school that is rising from the depths get this awesome opportunity. I know there are schools in Philly that have made great strides in achievement and safety.

In the end, he had to pick one city and one school for this speech, which means that about 1,000 students will be THRILLED and millions won't be. That's life, folks.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

               

Read the latest print issue

 

Philly Ed Feed

Become a Notebook member

 

Recent Comments

Top

Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300
notebook@thenotebook.org

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy