Donate today!
view counter

At the SRC: Business as usual

By Helen Gym on Sep 22, 2010 11:55 AM

Despite promises for greater transparency, this month’s School Reform Commission meeting continues a troubling trend in “contract ratification,” the approval of contracts after the work is underway or, in some cases, already completed.

Fourteen of the 43 contract-related resolutions – one-third – on today’s SRC docket are ratifications (this number does not count resolutions that accept grants or approve policies).

Last month, in response to questions about its practices, the SRC issued a statement explaining that contract ratifications are “rare exceptions” that result from an “immediate need to move forward with services and resources for schools.”

Yet as I noted in my most recent blog post, I found more than two dozen instances of contract ratification in the past year. One of the most eye-opening examples was the SRC's approval of $1 million to install turnstiles and miscellaneous security equipment at District headquarters – months after the installation had occurred. One can hardly imagine million dollar turnstiles qualifying as an “immediate need.” 

In the upcoming October issue of the Notebook, City Controller Alan Butkovitz raises concerns that the District does not require competitive bidding on its professional services contracts, which totaled $242 million last year.

Not surprisingly, many of this month’s contract ratifications are for just these professional services, ranging from Achieve 3000’s $1.6 million contract for Empowerment High School materials and professional development to $360,000 to SchoolWorks for audits in the charter renewal and Renaissance School selection process.

Today, the SRC is also scheduled to approve an unspecified amount of money for Blank Rome LLP, a high-powered law firm, for all legal fees to cover last year’s union negotiations (July 1, 2009-June 30, 2010). Alarmingly, while Resolution A-19 doesn't specify an amount for Blank Rome, it does state there shall be "no maximum amount of fees and costs for this matter" other than what was generally outlined in June 2009 (which was $500,000).

In light of the scandals around the Delaware River Port Authority and the Philadelphia Housing Authority – both of which started after inquiry around expenditures – it would seem to behoove the SRC to simply make clear to the public what the costs are for its legal work and to detail its expenditures. A blanket statement like "no maximum amount" might otherwise raise questions about oversight. 

I’m encouraged by the fact that at last week’s SRC meeting, Commissioner Joseph Dworetzky requested that any contract ratification come with a staff explanation for why they were submitted after the fact. Chief Financial Officer Michael Masch also explained to the Notebook in the October issue that Superintendent Arlene Ackerman has given District staff a “hard time” about contract ratifications and would “prefer zero ratifications.”

So far, however, such ratifications appear to be business as usual.

Click Here
view counter

Comments (3)

Submitted by radical (not verified) on September 22, 2010 9:41 pm

Please continue to report on this important issue. On my prep tomorrow, I will call the SRC and echo the need for transparency! Everyone should do the same 215.400.4040

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on September 23, 2010 8:37 am

The mayor and PA governor appoint the 5 board members. I don't think any effort to drive change at the SRC has a prayer without their involvement.

Submitted by Helen Gym on September 23, 2010 4:00 pm

I agree with you to an extent. I think there's something to the appointment and overall mission of the SRC where the Mayor and Governor have a voice. But Gov. Rendell is an outgoing governor. It should be noted as well that while the Governor may appoint, the Senate has to confirm - so not all the power lies in the governor's office.

In terms of day to day business operations though, I do think the public has a role to play here. The SRC is still a public entity and subjected to the same rules as any public body.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

Read the latest print issue

Philly Ed Feed

Recent Comments


Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy