The Notebook

Click here
view counter

Next year's shortfall estimated at $186 million

by Dale Mezzacappa on Mar 29 2012 Posted in Latest news

The School District faces a shortfall next year of $186 million on a projected $2.5 billion budget, Chief Recovery Officer Thomas Knudsen told the School Reform Commission on Thursday – and that grim number assumes that nothing goes wrong.

That figure will pay for a bare-bones educational experience for students, said Knudsen and SRC member Feather Houstoun in an interview. “That level of expenses is enough to open the door and conduct the essential mission of the District, which is education delivered in the classroom,” Knudsen said.

Houstoun told the several hundred people at the SRC meeting that the process ahead would be "painful," but that the SRC felt it best to be transparent.

Knudsen presented the so-called “lump sum budget,” explaining that the District is projecting $274 million more in costs from this year, largely due to increases in salaries, benefits, and what he termed a "whopping" rise of $110 million in debt-service payments. Salaries will rise $42 million and benefits $72 million, largely due to one-time payouts to those who retired or were laid off last year.

But the District's revenues are not keeping pace. Knudsen projects that revenues will rise by $142 million – and that is if City Council approves a change in property tax valuation that will bring in $94 million for the schools.

If Council rejects the change – and opposition is already mounting – the shortfall will balloon to $280 million. And the $186 million figure also assumes that Knudsen will be able to close a remaining $26 million gap for this fiscal year.

This also assumes that the General Assembly will pass Gov. Corbett's budget as is. Changes in the basic education subsidy or other line items, in the formula for funding charter schools, or enactment of a voucher program could push the shortfall into the $400 million range, Knudsen said, especially if coupled with a City Council rejection of the property tax revaluation.

Knudsen and Houstoun, chair of the SRC budget subcommittee, said that they would try their best to fill the budget hole without cutting further into school programming.

“Obviously, there are many many things we’d like to supplement,” said Houstoun. “But the first thing [we’re trying to accomplish] is not having people think about budget all the time. That is really destructive to classroom climate."

Both said they couldn’t see how the budget can be balanced next year without getting some labor concessions.

“Clearly, there will have to be discussions with labor,” Knudsen said. He demurred when asked whether the SRC would use its power to impose contract terms on the unions.

“Right now we’re not going anywhere near that conversation,” he said.

The $186 million figure is $45 million higher than what the District projected in January. Knudsen said that they added $20 million in expenses related to maintaining a “portfolio” of schools, which he did not enumerate. Presumably, this is related to turning over low-performing District schools to charter operators and/or granting some charter schools the right to expand.

At the same time, several factors are at work that could change the picture somewhat for the better. Knudsen said that the District has started working with the city to step up its property tax collections to get more timely payments and capture more delinquencies. And the figure for next year doesn’t yet include any efficiency savings identified by the Boston Consulting Group in its whirlwind six-week stint advising the District.

Knudsen said they hope to realize annual efficiencies of $90 million eventually, but are still working on the specifics of what can be saved next year in the transition to a different administrative and operational model.

The best they can do for now, Houstoun acknowledged, is present a plan that will assure some stability for schools, which this year endured two rounds of mid-year cuts in personnel and materials budgets.

“The SRC is committed to having schools operate not in a fiscal fire drill,” she said. “We saw schools having to cut deeper in January because they were not asked to cut in September. This is about providing as much certainty and stability in schools as we possibly can.”

One thing the SRC is not planning for is more money from the state. This year,  Philadelphia lost nearly $300 million in state aid and federal stimulus money.

For next year, Knudsen said, state aid to Philadelphia that is available for classroom use rose slightly, by about $16 million. That figure doesn’t count an increase in state pension contributions.

Other districts hit hard by this year’s draconian state budget cuts in education, which totaled $1.1 billion, are lobbying for more state funds, as are advocates from Philadelphia. Houstoun reiterated that the SRC's main job is to restore its reputation in Harrisburg first.

“I think the most important thing the SRC can do right now is build a reputation for financial stability, transparency, strong governance and decision-making, and earn back what unfortunately is, I suspect, the inaccurate but frequent view of the School District," she said. "That has to be our first priority….that’s the best we can do to build support in the General Assembly and governor’s office for public education in Philadelphia.”

Comments (15)

Submitted by Joe (not verified) on Thu, 03/29/2012 - 19:22.

No, it's 200 million, make that 400 million, no 600 million. These crooks only lie when they speak. NOTHING they say should be believed.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 03/29/2012 - 20:46.

What a bunch of crap. I was kicked out twice for being vocal so I don't go anymore. STOP the racism and fund the damn schools fairly. Give our kids the same chance their suburban peers take for granted. What a HUGE disgrace all of this is. I'm NOT giving a pass to scum like the charter thieves-Gamble, Evans etc. so called people of color--stealing from their own.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/03/2012 - 18:47.

Make it a Billion maybe 2 Billion. Make all the schools, Charters so Nutter can make some skim money for his family. To hell with the kids.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 03/29/2012 - 22:23.

Got linked here and I'm not from PA, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt...

To me, it looks like your city government has got to stop treating their budgets like it's made up of play money and run things as if it were an actual business... balance the books, TRIM THE FAT, accountability, etc.

I can guarantee that anyone with an iota of common sense could balance that budget over a single weekend but there's too much "politics" involved.

You want to fix the problem this weekend? Cut. Cut. Cut.

It's only hard if you're feeding from the same trough...

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 03/29/2012 - 23:28.

It's not hard financially to balance a budget, sure. You make revenue equal spending and you're done. Where it gets more complicated is when you have federal mandates, state mandates, contracts with employees, obligations to students. THAT is not a matter of common, that's a matter of priorities.

As a teacher who left a far more lucrative job in a better paying district to come and teach in Philadelphia I will understand if they try to cut teacher salaries even more. I hope everyone will understand when well educated teachers who will have no problem getting better paying jobs elsewhere leave the city to teach in better funded districts or in private sector jobs.

Submitted by MBA to M'Ed mom (not verified) on Fri, 03/30/2012 - 21:04.

I would like the city to do its part to raise revenue by stopping let all these vacant and abandonded properties that do not pay their taxes be so difficult to purchase and pay takes on. I wanted to buy a lot that hadn't paid taxes in 20 years but the amount was too small to get a sherrif's sale and so that lot sits vacant, dirty and still deliquent on taxes.

Additionally, I would like to NOT see a superintendent that has a driver, or such huger overhead costs at 440. That is such a waste of my money. I would rather have a school nurse in my childs school than a lot of administrative staff at 440.

Cuts in pay, benefits, perks, and staff should happen at the top first, where the kids do not feel it. I hate that my child doesn't always have toilet paper in the bathroom or paper towels or cold water, and today I saw mice running around in the building, but the school had to cut their janitorial staff which may cause a health risk for my child. There is no reason 440 should have expense like trips or lunches when my child has to eat with mice.

The money that 440 got for letting a film crew film a tv pilot in their building a few weeks ago, needs to go to the coffers of the school and I hope it did.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 04/01/2012 - 11:01.

Yes. A huge grain of salt. What you might not understand is that we have a teachers' union here who likes the status quo, or even wants to go backwards. They want no accountability, no competition, and no firing of incompetent teachers. They have their head in the trough and their only solution to every problem is more money from taxpayers. Now the trough is empty. There will be either concessions next year from the PFT or more layoffs. The SRC should cancel the contract and unilaterally make cuts to benefits and pay. If the teachers don't like it, they are free to go work for another school district if they can. There are plenty of teachers out of work who will step in.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/30/2012 - 18:36.

Why on Earth did you leave a job in a better paying district to teach in Philadelphia?

Submitted by A Touch of Sense (not verified) on Sun, 04/01/2012 - 12:01.

What you do not understand is that you are paroting the myths and hype about the teacher's unions and the power of the SRC to unilaterally dictate terms of the contract.

The district tried to do that last year and they had their behinds handed to them by the Supreme Court who essentially told them "No you can not breach the contract."

The SRC only had the power to abrogate contracts that were in effect at the time of the state takeover. That was ten years ago. Once the SRC negotiated their own contract with the PFT, that provision ended. What will be interesting is the interplay of laws once the present contract expires because there is a whole legal process required if they cannot agree on terms.

The SRC would be fools again to try to dictate contract terms because it would cause so much turmoil the children would be negatively affected. They would also likely then face a constitutional challenge to the ACT which created the SRC itself.

It is constitutionally repugnant for the legislature to delegate its lawmaking and lawchanging capacity to an unelected body which was politically appointed. You see, this is America and we still have a constitution.

The PFT and unions across America have given school boards all of the flexibility they need to make rational reforms. So far everything the politicians have done has been a failure -- like the Renaissance schools inititiative in Philadelphia.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 04/01/2012 - 14:39.

Then layoffs it is. There is a huge shortfallin PSD funding. The state already spends 40% of all state revenue on education. That leaves a little over half for EVERYTHING else. There will be no more tax increases, so it's either concesions or layoffs. Your choice.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 20:47.

Hi, governor. We chose taxing Marcellus shale drillers.

Submitted by The Governor's Lackey (not verified) on Tue, 04/03/2012 - 08:56.

No my friends, the way to improve our schools is to tax the public employees, not the Marcellus Shale millionaires or others who contribute to my campaign fund.

You union types need to accept that you are merely factory workers in our test preparation factories and stop trying to think that you are professionals with a right to a decent standard of living.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/03/2012 - 21:16.

Yea, bring back the 14 hour workday and 7 day workweek for everybody (except the rich, of course). That will make our country great again!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 18:28.

The unions have given back too much. If we were the Teamsters, we would know exactly how to handle it.

Submitted by Greg N. (not verified) on Sat, 04/07/2012 - 11:08.

FINALLY, WALKER IN WISCONSIN, HAS CROSSED THE LINE FOR EVERYBODY TO SEE. LIMITING WOMEN'S RIGHTS WILL DO HIM IN IN JUNE----THANK GOD. GET RID OF THESE RIGHT WING NUTS, THE SO CALLED TEA PARTY PEOPLE. GET OUT AND STAY OUT.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

          

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

 

Philly Ed Feed

Recent Comments

Top

Public School Notebook

3721 Midvale Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19129
Phone: (215) 951-0330, ext. 2107
Fax: (215) 951-0342
notebook@thenotebook.org

© Copyright 2012 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy