Please Join Today!
view counter

From community and labor leaders, skepticism over BCG

By Benjamin Herold on Jun 6, 2012 04:53 PM

by Benjamin Herold
for the Notebook and WHYY/NewsWorks

The School Reform Commission and private philanthropists may be offering considerable support to the Boston Consulting Group and vigorously defending their work.

But the District’s new management consultants have received a substantially cooler reaction from Philadelphia’s community and labor leaders.

“We at the NAACP despise the Boston Consulting Group,” said J. Whyatt Mondesire, the president of the venerable civil rights group’s Philadelphia chapter, during a protest rally before last week’s School Reform Commission vote on the District budget.

Mondesire was one of several speakers to blast BCG – and the unusual funding arrangement supporting its work in Philadelphia .

Robert McGrogan, the president of the principals' union, Commonwealth Association of School Administrators, called it a mistake for the District to rely on high-priced outside consultants and an expensive temporary executive, District Chief Recovery Officer Thomas Knudsen, to guide it through the current financial crisis.

“They’re going to be gone with their pockets full, and we’re going to be left with the legacy of whatever decisions they make,” McGrogan said.

Activist Helen Gym of Parents United for Public Education compared BCG to Edison Schools, a private company that 10 years ago also recommended dramatic changes to the management of Philadelphia schools. (Disclosure: Gym is also a Notebook board member.)

“We paid Edison Schools $2.4 million in 2001 to do a plan for our schools,” said Gym. “Now we’re paying $2.7 million to the Boston Consulting Group, and they’re making the same promises: Private outfitters can turn our schools around.”

“It’ll be terrible for our kids,” Gym concluded, drawing cheers from a raucous crowd at the rally.

During the SRC meeting, retired teacher Karel Kilimnik offered formal testimony on BCG, repeatedly asking when the group’s work would be made public. 

“There should be a printed report,” Kilimnik said.

Ramos responded that BCG has “generated a lot of analytical work” and that the SRC “has asked them to synthesize it and compile it in a way that can be useful.”

That documentation should be released “in the next few weeks,” said Ramos.

Last month, Enon Tabernacle Church in West Oak Lane, the largest predominantly African-American congregation in the city, organized a mass meeting demanding answers from Knudsen, Ramos and other District officials about the transformation plan. People at the meeting were openly skeptical about this reliance on outsiders.

Last week, Enon's senior pastor, the Rev. Alyn Waller, delivered their views to the SRC.

 "Jettison the relationship with the outside entities that have received money without giving back any report,” Waller told the commissioners.  

“Start over. Look into the community, where all the resources are.”

A BCG spokesperson declined to comment on the firm's work in Philadelphia.

“As a matter of policy, BCG does not comment on its work with clients,” wrote David Fondiller, in response to an emailed request for an interview. 

But William Penn Foundation president Jeremy Nowak, who has raised the money for BCG's contract, says that the foundation is pleased with its work. The District was in such dire straits that it had no choice but to bring in an outside consultant, he said.

"From a foundation perspective, we received a quick return on our grant investment," Nowak maintained. "It brought the conversation out of the drift of financial crisis and into a much-improved vision of what is possible."

Click Here
view counter

Comments (9)

Submitted by Concerned Philadlephian (not verified) on June 6, 2012 8:34 pm

While I appreciate that the Notebook notes possibly conflicts of interest, Nowak has a conflict of interest. He headed Mastery Charter's Board of Directors. So, Nowak's interests aren't for the entire School District of Philadelphia - they are sided with Mastery Charter Corp.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on June 7, 2012 6:30 am


Submitted by Hope Moffett (not verified) on June 6, 2012 9:06 pm

Ramos should trust that there are people capable of understanding BCG's analytical work and that the organization has no need to overly package the information they obtained. We want the information as well as the interpretation.

Submitted by Timothy Boyle on June 7, 2012 6:02 am

 When you have stopped trusting the public to know what it wants for its schools, then you do not deserve stewardship over a public system. If the only proof that BCG is doing an adequate job is the pleasure of the funders, then the plan isn't worth the paper it is printed on. We in Philadelphia are UNITED against this plan. Let that be the record for how this nonsense went down.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on June 7, 2012 4:56 pm

AGAIN, you give far too much credibility to this slithering types. You're on the wrong road. They don't even remotely think they know best what's good for our kids. They don't even ponder such things. They don't care one way or the other. This is ALL about money for the already rich---------------Period----End of story.

Submitted by Pat (not verified) on June 19, 2012 1:48 pm

Timothy-----WE ALL BETTER be united in this fight.

Submitted by A Touch of Sense (not verified) on June 7, 2012 7:27 am

Their conflicts of interest are unethical. They all serve organizations which have and will receive financial benefit from privatization.

It is absurd that these guys are driving education policy in our public schools. The BCG has not published anything of significance. The reason they haven't is they can't.

When they do publish something, it will be ripped apart for its lack of substance, poor documentation and obvious ideology.

And what is utterly indefensible is that they are intentionally circumventing the democratic process. And they want to run our schools?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on June 10, 2012 2:44 pm

Absurd and corrupt pretty much sum it up. As they say in South Philly, Nutter and The SRC are warts on the ass of life---------------------and proud of it apparently.

Submitted by Amyifkgn10 (not verified) on August 25, 2014 7:23 am

Boston Consulting Group has been making the news headlines for a long time. I

too heard about the news on School Reform Commission and private

philanthropists offering support to the BCG. I hope the SRC meetings decision

favors the children.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

Read the latest print issue

Philly Ed Feed

Recent Comments


Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy