Martinez faces public, explains his vision for improving the District
by thenotebook on Jun 25 2012 Posted in Latest news

Superintendent candidate Pedro Martinez faced dozens of questioners during a public forum Monday at School District headquarters.
by Dale Mezzacappa, Benjamin Herold and Katie McCabe
Pedro Martinez is on board with the need to “increase quality seats” in Philadelphia schools, endorsing the primary reform strategy of the School Reform Commission that is considering whether to hire him as the next superintendent.
But while Martinez described himself as a strong supporter of school choice, he emphasized that charter schools are part of the solution but “not a magic bullet” and said that the cornerstone of lasting reform are strong principals and well-supported teachers.
"My belief is that the key to really showing significant and sustainable gains is to work with staff," he said. "When principals and teachers are on your side, there is no limit to the potential of the school district."
Currently the deputy superintendent for instruction in Clark County, NV (Las Vegas), Martinez, 42, is one of two finalists for the District's top job. The other, William Hite, is the superintendent of the Prince George's Country, Maryland School District.
Listen to Benjamin Herold's radio report for WHYY News.
Both candidates are facing an uphill battle to win over a public worn down by the leadership controversies, budget woes, and ideological battles that have rocked Philadelphia schools over the past 12 months.
"I might be waiting for Superman to come along in terms of what would actually satisfy me," said Laura Boyce, a former District teacher who now teaches English at Mastery-Simon Gratz High.
Boyce was one of about 35 people to take part in an afternoon discussion between Martinez and teachers, part of a whirlwind series of meet-and-greets the candidate had with parents, principals, students, business leaders, charter operators and elected officials before closing things out with a two-hour-plus public forum attended by over 100 people Monday evening.
Hite will go through a similar schedule Tuesday.
Whichever candidate is ultimately hired will face a mountain of problems, starting with the District's massive budget deficit next year.
But Martinez, confident and calm under sometimes emotional questioning from the public, didn’t seem overly concerned. At one point, he said that a $300 million deficit doesn't worry him – he's faced similar shortfalls in Chicago and in Nevada, which he said took a bigger hit from the recession than any other state. Even in its scaled-down budget, Martinez said Philadelphia spends more per student than Las Vegas.
The District's current financial predicament is an "opportunity to rethink the system," he said.
“I feel that there is so much potential here," he said.
"While there are challenges, they are manageable.”
Martinez is also one of five finalists for the superintendency in Washoe County, NV (Reno), where he previously worked. But he told a reporter after Monday's meeting that Philadelphia is his first choice.
An accountant who also served as the chief financial officer of the Chicago Public Schools, he was pressed by educators concerned about his lack of teaching experience. He defended his background, at one point saying that it could be a plus that allowed him to see the “big picture.”
“You need somebody that’s going to be able to bring all the systems together and asks the tough questions,” said Martinez, “not somebody who just understands instruction.”
In general, he said, it’s up to him and central district leadership to set the vision while problem-solving happens at the schools.
“I have never taught, but teachers will tell you one thing, they feel I can connect with them. I’ve been in several hundred schools and more than 2000 classrooms. … There’s not a day that goes by that I’m not talking to a teacher or principal.”
He also said that if he gets the job, he will spend much of his time consulting with the community in crafting his own blueprint for change, arguing that the District's controversial reorganization plan unveiled in April lacks detail and needs more work.
“I think that the most important thing to having a plan is that it is shared with the community,” he said.
During an afternoon session with teachers, Martinez got questions on everything from instrumental music to the future of school libraries. Several teachers expressed concern over his connection to the influential Broad Superintendents Academy, often accused of promoting a leadership style that is top-down and anti-union.
Martinez responded that he prefers collaboration and would not bring a pre-packaged reform model to Philadelphia.
“Many graduates from the Broad program make this mistake. People come in with their own plan," said Martinez. "I don't believe that. I believe there is a rich history in our community, in our neighborhoods, in our schools."
Echoing a phrase that has recently come to dominate talk of reform efforts in Philadelphia, Martinez said his emphasis would be on expanding the number of "quality seats" in city schools.
That includes charters, a hot topic of conversation throughout the day. When asked by Councilwoman Jannie Blackwell during the public forum about the role charters should play, Martinez was clear:
“Charters are not the magic bullet," he said. "We have to hold charter schools to the exact same standards as our traditional schools.”
Rounds of applause followed audience members who questioned Martinez on how he would support traditional neighborhood schools.
Higher standards, including expanding Advanced Placement classes in high schools, are critical, he said. He also emphasized that increased autonomy for high-performing schools was key.
One straetegy for increasing “quality seats,” Martinez said, is making successful small schools bigger – an answer that worried some people as not recognizing that the success could in part be due to small size.
Unfazed by frequent flares of frustration from questioners, Martinez said that that he would rather see passion than apathy.
“This is the energy we need to harness," said Martinez.
Martinez took credit for policies in Las Vegas that he said rapidly increased student achievement and graduation rates, particularly among African American and Latino men. The district instituted a new reading and math curriculum in the lower grades and prepared individual academic plans for all the students.
Clark County, which has 311,000 students and high schools with more than 2000 students, also implemented an aggressive turnaround program.
He said there was initially pushback, but teachers, parents and students came around. He encouraged the media to cover the turnaround closely.
During an afternoon meeting with parents, Martinez met aggressive questioning about how he would involve the public in District decision-making and navigate the city's treacherous political waters.
Parent Jay Cohen posed a scenario intended to determine if Martinez would see parents and community - or politicians and the SRC - as his boss.
"That’s a question I really can't answer," responded Martinez. "The only way I would take this role ... is if the agenda is about children."
This was one of several responses that left some community members frustrated.
Gloria Thomas, the mother of a rising senior at Sayre High School, also expressed concern that Martinez lacked the political savvy necessary for the Philadelphia superintendency.
"If you can't schmooze people, we won't get the finances we need in order to educate our children," said Thomas.
“Does he know enough of the right people to get his back scratched in the right way so our school district doesn’t keep losing funds?”
Earlier in the day, Martinez met privately with elected officials.
Councilwoman Jannie Blackwell called Martinez "very capable of doing the job" if he gets the opportunity but said it's unlikely he'll be able to extract more money out of City Council.
Martinez has a compelling personal story – born in poverty in Mexico, he grew up in Chicago and was the first in his family to graduate high school and college. In his Chicago high school, only 171 students from a freshman class of 700 ultimately graduated, and most of them were from a gifted class “started by rebellious teachers” in defiance of the district’s indifference to poor Black and Latino children.
He started his accounting career in the private sector, and his firm was asked by the Archdiocese of Chicago to help it out of financial trouble in the 1990s.
He said that his mother, a devout Catholic, told him he had a duty to give back – which led to his interest in education and drew the attention of Arne Duncan, then the Chicago school superintendent. He became Duncan’s chief financial officer.
Martinez has a 20-month-old son and said if “blessed” to be chosen as superintendent, he would commit to sending him to the public system. He said he recognized that not being from Philadelphia could be a “weakness,” but he immediately starting referring to the district as “we” and said he has been following the district’s history and problems since 2000.
“I would not be here if I didn’t have a passion for your community and a passion for you children," he said.
"I believe that working together we can make it one of the best school systems in the country."







Comments (12)
Submitted by Ken (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 07:28.
Martinez. "The only way I would take this role...is if the agenda is about children."
Can an answer to a question be any lamer than this. Everyone is for the children. However, there are many different agendas that different stakeholders think will be best for the children. If I recall correctly, our last superintendent said if you were against her programs you were against the children.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 13:36.
Isn't that what the Queen always said?!! Uh, huh...
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 08:08.
The people who came to the community meetings last winter all said they wanted an educator. Obviously, the SRC decided to ignore that. I don't know how they justify even considering Mr. Martinez.
Schools are not a business. Children are not just test scores. Mr. Martinez's winded answers only highlighted the fact that he knows very little about education.
Lisa
Submitted by Rich Migliore (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 08:38.
I went to three of the sessions yesterday and he did say many of the right things. He also was large on rhetoric in many of his answers.
However, Mr. Martinez certainly said little which would lead one to believe he has any real understanding of the teaching and learning process or the real meaning of test scores. He is an Arne Duncan friend and disciple.
When asked about his lack of experience as an educator, his answer was that he asked Arne Duncan in Chicago to be the supervisor of educators and talked extensively with teachers and principals. He said he had one year of experience in that position.
When asked about the issue of charter schools excluding special ed students, instead of answering the question with any true knowledge and understanding of the issue, he went on with the rhetoric of creating more "high performing seats."
When asked about his Broad Academy training, he said he is really about shared leadership and collaboration.
He touted test score improvements in Clark County, but I was surprised that no one asked him about the issue of turning schools into test preparation factories and the validity and reliability of high stakes testing practices.
He seemed like a very decent fellow with a lot to learn. He seems to understand that he has a lot to learn which is a good thing.
The SRC members listened very intently to the questions of the participants and the answers Mr. Martinez gave. They obviously had a planned system they were following.
I also believe the SRC members are very sincere in this process, and I am appreciative that they took the time and effort to hold theses public sessions.
I understand that many are skeptical, but this is the first time in my lifetime with the district, that any school board has done this. They too live in this political arena.
We are all learners.
Submitted by Education Grad Student (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 16:04.
Rich,
I attended the Child as Citizen, Child as Hope forum at Saint Joseph's University in September (http://www.sju.edu/news/archives/violence_panel_092311.html). I was impressed with Dr. Leroy Nunery and his insistence on the importance of moving from a rules-based culture to a values-based culture in schools. He was also very knowledgeable of the particular issues in Philly regarding youth violence and its impact on schools. Of course, I would expect this because he's a Philadelphian and was the acting superintendent at the time of the forum.
And then I read this about his involvement in the issue regarding students with multiple disabilities at Mastery Clymer (http://thenotebook.org/blog/124936/district-mastery-reach-agreement-serv...):
"Nunery overrode the concerns of the District’s academic experts and authorized the inclusion of a two-sentence paragraph in the charter giving Clymer to Mastery:
Commencing on July 1, 2012, and for the remainder of the Term, the Charter School shall not be required to maintain the MDS Program nor to provide the two (2) Multi-Disabilities Support classes at the Charter School."
--
His words and actions clearly were not consistent regarding a values-based culture and students with disabilities because a values-based culture would not disregard the rights of students with disabilities and their parents. In addition, had this issue not been resolved, his clause could have been the grounds for litigation.
So, Mr. Martinez can talk a good game about working with teachers and principals, but does his record show that this has been his approach? In addition, a lack of knowledge about issues in the classroom is a glaring issue for Mr. Martinez! How can one be an effective superintendent without knowing about the intricacies of teaching and learning? Teaching and learning is the core function of any school district!
Mr. Martinez might be qualified to be a CFO for a district, but his lack of education experience makes me skeptical of his ability to be a superintendent. In addition, he hasn't been superintendent of Clark County's schools for very long and the demographics of districts in Nevada are much different from Philadelphia's demographics.
EGS
Submitted by Rich Migliore (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 22:16.
I agree. There is no substitute for a background of experience in education as a teacher and school leader. You can't read about it in books. You can't get it just from listening to teachers. You have to do it to understand it.
Your question about what his record shows is an important question. What does his record show? I would hope some people and the SRC did some reading up on issues with his record.
The other candidate, Dr. Hite, has experience as a teacher, middle school principal and high school principal. He is also a superintendent. He also has a Master's degree and Doctorate in educational leadership. He knows the issues of education. That was clearly evident today.
Also, I do believe he said he was a reading teacher. So he probably knows a good bit about pedagogy. He did implement a pay for performance plan, but it was a bonus plan that was designed with teachers and principals chosen by the union.
I will give you some more impressions as the discussion brews. So far, Dr. Hite has my vote.
Submitted by Education Grad Student (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 23:32.
I didn't watch the Q and A with Mr. Martinez's Q and A, but I did watch the Q and A with Dr. Hite. He was knowledgeable of both the instructional and administrative issues. For example, he gave a very detailed explanation of value added measurement and some of its flaws and the methodological issues. He mentioned the importance of reflective teaching on a couple of occasions, which was encouraging because reflective teaching is a form of professional development which can occur daily. He articulated a strong belief in equal opportunity and access for all which is very important because there is still a great deal of opportunity segregation in Philadelphia.
Dr. Hite was aware of some of the issues in Philadelphia, such as the facilities master plan. He talked as much about teachers as about principals, and spoke more in terms of capacity building an human capital than getting rid of ineffective teachers or principals. I was also encouraged that he spoke about the issue of teacher retention, which is an important issue that sometimes flies under the radar. He also talked about going to meet people where they are (e.g., in their homes) in order to engage them in the education of their children. Overall, he answered most questions honestly and did not dance around questions. There were times when he did not answer specific questions due to a lack of knowledge about the specific issues here in Philly, but that is understandable given that he hasn't worked before in Philly. An example of this was enrollment caps at charter schools. He showed tough many of his answers that he has a wealth of experience and knowledge about the complex issues of administration and instruction in a school district.
In terms of experience and knowledge, he appears to be very qualified for the job. Of course, it's all about actions, not about words. It will be his actions that will reflect his values, rather than his words.
Submitted by Gloria Endres (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 09:23.
I suppose the most obvious question is: Is there no one in the immediate Philadelphia area from all the local administrators qualified to lead the schools? Our last bona fide Philadelphia superintendant was Connie Clayton who brought years of classroom experience into the job.
One can always hire accountants to count the beans and balance the books. But if the CEO does not understand the difference between good and bad teaching practice, how can he hold others accountable for same.
Being a graduate of the Broad program and a disciple of Arne Duncan are not suitable credentials for this important post. This will be another trial and error, on the job learner.
Not nearly good enough.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 09:41.
I would go so far as to say that being a graduate of the Broad program and a disciple of Arne Duncan are credentials that should automatically DISQUALIFY a person for this post.
Submitted by Anon (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 09:25.
Sylvia Simms should not have been allowed to run (or should I say allowed to fail to run?) the parent meeting. Typical SDP mishandling of an opportunity for parents.
Submitted by Education Grad Student (not verified) on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 16:37.
Mr. Martinez doesn't appear to be aware of the pension issues that the District faces. 2012 is just the tip of the iceberg (See http://www.commonwealthfoundation.org/research/detail/pennsylvania-state...). The financial issues for the District are more structural than related to inefficiency or waste (although there are always opportunities to reduce inefficiencies and waste).
Is Mr. Martinez able to work with academic leaders in the District, in the way that Tom Knudsen has? I'm thinking specifically of how Mr. Knudsen worked with Penny Nixon to protect core academic programs (http://thenotebook.org/blog/124905/src-prepares-vote-bare-bones-budget-t...). Is he willing to defer to those who know more about what is important for teaching and learning?
Mr. Martinez is trying to make the financial situation in the District sound sunny when there's nothing sunny about it!
Submitted by Kermgabe (not verified) on Sat, 10/27/2012 - 20:17.
get cheap ugg canada online online shopping QNFFjpxF http://www.uggs-canada.org/
Post new comment