Menu
Paid Advertisement
view counter

District leaders field questions on closings

Here are highlights of an hour-long press briefing Wednesday with Superintendent William Hite, Deputy Superintendent Paul Kihn, and Danielle Floyd, who headed up the School District's facilities planning process, on the rationale and the process for closing 37 school buildings and relocating or reconfiguring dozens of other schools in the District.

Talk about the academic performance of the schools that are closing versus the receiving schools. Are all of the students who are going to be reassigned going to higher-performing schools? What message would you have to parents where that is not the case?

William Hite: Our work moving forward is to make sure that we do three things: One is to ensure that there is a safe route to school and a safe environment in school. The second is to dramatically improve the academic offerings at all of the schools that are receiving students. ... And then the third is to dramatically improve their environment or the facility. So the thing I would communicate moving forward is that in order [for] all students [to achieve] at high levels, we have to create the programs and opportunities at all of our schools regardless of where [students] attend.

Do you know how many students are being moved to lower-performing schools?

Paul Kihn: We are currently doing that. We don’t have a final assessment of that, but we do know that the vast majority of students are going to schools that are basically the same performance as their current schools. There are a number of students that are going to better-performing schools, and there is a small number of students who are going to be going to schools that are currently lower-performing. I think Dr. Hite is expressing a commitment to focus on those schools in particular to ensure that we bring up the academic outcomes in those schools. The message to parents is clear, and we will be developing that over the next several months, in collaboration with them: What is the specific plan for those schools to ensure that the outcome is good.

Can you talk about the safety aspect, walking to schools?

Hite: We’ve actually worked already with the police department and we worked specifically with the crime unit and really analyzed all of those routes, particularly at those middle and high schools, and the police provided us with a set of recommendations about the types of resources that they will be assisting us with to ensure safe corridors to school and to ensure safe environments within the schools.

Who was involved in crafting this list?

Kihn: It was an incredibly comprehensive and complicated effort run by District staff. It was led by the Capital team and the Facilities Master Planning team, but it was cross-functional, so we had, for the past many months, groups of 30 or 40 internal staff gathering regularly to review the data and reporting back on their building visits and their conversations, and it was run by the internal staff using data from the visits as well as analysis of the schools.

What are the chances of reversing some of these decisions based on the community feedback you get?

Hite: Well, considering some of the information, and you can see where we started and the number of schools we started with and the number of schools that we landed on, and then where we are today, we already changed out many of the schools that were part of the recommendation. And so this is the recommendation that represents all of that analysis that Paul just described, and it’s our recommendation moving forward. Naturally we want information from the community; if there are opportunities to have some sort of learning in those meetings where individuals have better ideas on how we can do this and it makes sense, then naturally we can amend our recommendation moving forward. But right now this represents our best recommendation.

Kihn: Based on the facts that we have and the process we’ve gone through, this is the best set of recommendations. If people have other facts or different facts or we’ve misunderstood something, there is a chance that we would reconsider, but we’ve gone through an elaborate process here, so the intent is not to change the recommendations.

What will be done with the closed facilities?                        

Kihn: We have a plan to dispose of property. So the 37 buildings, there will be a process that will be publicly articulated where they will be sold with community input about what will happen to them. We’re thinking of doing that in an expedited way, so that these buildings do not remain closed and unoccupied within communities and become blights in the communities, so we have a strand of work that is trying to accelerate the process of disposing of the buildings.

Can you tell me what are the principal components of the $28 million (in savings)?     

Hite: Most are staffing. There are utility costs as well, there is a cost that we use to maintain the building. But most of the savings is in staffing: Significant numbers of staff are in support positions at these schools.

I think what we’re hearing is that for the vast majority of students, they won’t be going to a school that is … better and the savings relative to the District’s overall budget, while not insignificant, are relatively marginal. Given the amount of confusion and disruption that these [closings] are likely to cause, can you make the case for why this is necessary and valuable at this scale at this time?

Hite: Sure, and I don’t consider the savings to be marginal at all. I think that the savings are very close to what is in our five-year financial plan. One of the things I think is really important is that our inability to achieve any one of those categories then puts us in financial risk. I’ll use an example: Our financial plan for this year includes a $300 million bond, getting concessions from labor, the number of schools closed in order to realize a set of savings, so all of those things play together … which means that the savings is a part of our fiscal plan. If we don’t realize those savings, then we would have to find other ways to get that amount of revenue from other types of actions, and we don’t have many actions left. Unless, I mean there’s always an opportunity to lay off more people or run class sizes up. This district has already experienced, unfortunately, a lot of those draconian types of measures and so we don’t have a lot of options. ... This actually has to happen.

This is not unique to Philadelphia. This is happening in large, urban centers all over the country, and part of the realization of these large, urban centers is that they can no longer sustain the type of physical inventory that is not in use, and we’re realizing the same thing here. It’s not just the one-year savings, it’s the run-rate savings over a five-year period, and when you look at that amount of money over a five-year period, it’s pretty substantial.

Superintendent, to what degree are you chasing a moving train here? You’re closing all these schools this year to get to an average of 80 percent [utilization], but if you look at something like Strawberry Mansion High School, which is severely underpopulated, merging with Ben Franklin, which is also severely underpopulated - if all the students from Strawberry Mansion go to Ben Franklin, are they going to be at 80 percent? Or are they going to be somewhere in the 60s?

Hite: Well, Ben Franklin will be, after this … closer to capacity. ... The goal is really to improve all of the academic options for students and to improve those programs that exist at Franklin or anywhere else that’s receiving students, and I think that is what will ultimately drive future capacity and enrollment in the schools.

Are you closing any schools that you would not consider to be low-performing?

Kihn: We are moving a couple of schools that we would not consider low-performing, so we are closing the facility, but not the program.

Which would those be?

Danielle Floyd:  Abigail Vare Elementary School, Lankenau High School, Motivation, AMY at James Martin. I believe that is it.

I wonder if you can speak to the equity dimension of this, in terms of neighborhoods and in terms of impact on African American students.

Hite: We are running that analysis, but I don’t know if we have those data yet, but we are doing that analysis to determine if there is a disparate impact on certain groups.

Can we talk about the difficulty of this decision, why these moves are necessary…?

Hite: I’m not a superintendent that is walking around looking for districts where we need to do school closures. … These actions are actions that should have been taken years ago, and I think that many superintendents, understanding the difficulty to be associated with school closures, chose to kick it down, and kicked it down to let someone else deal with this, and now we have no choice. If we don’t choose to take these actions now, we actually have no money to spend, and so the difficulty, yes -- will it create anxiety and a lot of emotion? Oh, absolutely, it will, but perhaps if these decisions were made years ago, when many of our students were selecting out of some of our facilities, then it would have been just as hard, but not at this level of magnitude. And now, my team and I, we’re coming in and have to play catch-up on something that was, as far as I am concerned, clear to everyone in this city and in this District, that this at some point has to happen, and so I’m the one who is making the recommendation.

Would I have liked to begin after three months in the School District of Philadelphia to be really talking about other things? I would much rather do that, but this is where we are, and because I’m in this role, it is my responsibility to make these recommendations.


Here is the list of proposed closings and relocations released at the press briefing:

School to close - Facility to close (28)

  • Carroll, Charles H.S.
  • Cooke, Jay
  • Douglas, Stephen A. H.S.
  • Duckrey, Tanner
  • Fairhill
  • Ferguson, Joseph C.
  • Fulton, Robert
  • Germantown H.S.
  • Gompers, Samuel
  • Hill, Leslie P.
  • Kinsey, John L.
  • Leidy
  • McCloskey, John F.
  • McMichael, Morton
  • Meade, Gen. George C.
  • Morris, Robert
  • Overbrook Elementary
  • Peirce, Thomas M.
  • Pepper, George M.S.
  • Reynolds, Gen. John F.
  • Shaw, Anna M.S.
  • Sheridan West Academy
  • Smith
  • Strawberry Mansion H.S.
  • Taylor, Bayard
  • University City H.S.
  • Whittier, John G.
  • Wilson, Alexander

Facility to close - School to relocate (6)

  • AMY at Martin (co-located with Penn Treaty MS)
  • Carnell Annex at Fels (grades 7-8 to St. Bernard in Dec., then to Harding M.S.)
  • Lankenau H.S. (co-located with Roxborough H.S.)
  • Parkway Northwest (co-located with Leeds M.S.)
  • Phila. Military Acad. at Elverson (merged with Acad. at Leeds at new site: Roosevelt)
  • Vare, Abigail (to G. Washington)

Facility to close - School to be absorbed into another (3)

  • Bok, Edw. W. Technical H.S. (CTE programs relocate to South Phila. H.S.)
  • Communications Tech H.S. (CTE programs relocate as an academy within Bartram H.S.)
  • Robeson H.S. (programs relocate to Sayre H.S.)

School to relocate - Facility stays in use (2)

  • Motivation H.S. (to Turner M.S. building - current site stays in use as Penrose Elem.)
  • Phila. Military Acad. at Leeds  (merged with Acad. at Elverson at new site: Roosevelt) - current site stays in use as Leeds M.S.

School to close - Facility stays in use (5)

  • Lamberton, Robert H.S. (facility stays in use by Lamberton Elem.)
  • Pratt, Anna B. (facility stays in use for pre-K)
  • Roosevelt, Theodore (facility to house Phila. Military Academy)
  • Vaux, Robert H.S. (facility to house a new elementary school)
  • Washington, George Elem. (facility to house A. Vare Elem.)
 
view counter

Comments (16)

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on December 15, 2012 8:41 am
Can anyone answer this question : Are there going to be another round of Renaissance Schools conversions?
Submitted by Paul Socolar on December 15, 2012 9:55 am

At this same press briefing, District officials spoke of their commitment to continuing to work on school turnarounds, and they specifically said that where Promise Academies are being closed (and there are several), the District would replace them with new ones because they see the model as successful. There is a budget line in the five-year plan to fund school turnarounds, which officials said they would use to improve schools that will be receiving students from school closures.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on December 15, 2012 3:26 pm
Paul, can you link to the five-year plan with the page of the budget line you are referring to? By turnarounds to improve schools receiving students from school closures, are they referring to solely Renaissance charters and Promise Academies? Or are there other potential options for receiving schools to get additional resources without having to lose all or most of its staff? God I hope so. Otherwise that's like killing off both the closing and receiving school communities.
Submitted by Paul Socolar on December 15, 2012 4:09 pm

http://webgui.phila.k12.pa.us/uploads/oW/X2/oWX2B2as_5orOlChKCw5jw/SDPFY...

On p. 9 of the plan, there's a line called "new investments in high-quality seats" that starts at $19M in fiscal year 2014 and grows from there.

There are several paragraphs of text about that budget line, concluding with the following statement:

The ultimate decisions about the mix of new investments, which are yet to be made, will be the result of many factors, including ongoing changes in state legislation, the performance and demonstrated cost-effectiveness of different options over time, and the policy direction set by the SRC. At this point, therefore, the level of funding available cannot be correlated with any specific investment program or number of seats to be created. What is clear, however, is that unless there is a significant change to the fiscal environment in which the SDP is operating – in particular, new sources of revenue – the funds available for making any investments in high performing seats beyond current levels will be inadequate.

Submitted by Joe (not verified) on December 15, 2012 1:22 pm
Anybody who really believes Dr. Hite had anything of consequence to do with these closings, I have a bridge to sell you. This was decided LONG ago and he had nothing to do with it. He's here because he's following a script set out for him LONG ago or he wouldn't be here at all. Ackerman, as embarrassing and annoying as she was, also was following the same script. The script goes like this, "How can we make as much money on the inner city folks and how much collateral damage can we do to keep these folks down." Destroying unions is another way to keep people "in their place" and by extension, destroy the Democratic Party. It's all tied together and people like Nutter and Corbett are in the loop. I also believe the PFT could well be compromised too at the leadership level. Of course, as long as The Republicans have total lunatics like Huckabee and Pat Robertson slithering around, they'll NEVER win another election for President.
Submitted by Linda K. (not verified) on December 16, 2012 2:57 am
I can back you up.....as a former middle school now k-8 school teacher, I was working on my dissertation at SJU dealing with middle schools. I noted the change in the research as far back as Vallas who cited school violence as being greatest in middle schools and least in k-8 schools as a reason to close the middle schools and open more k-8 schools. I started working on my dissertation noting that the SDP dropped from 45 to 21 middle schools over the course of 4 and half years......the dye was cast and here we are....amazing how the research can be pulled out when needed and hidden when it conflicts with the agenda.
Submitted by anonymous (not verified) on December 16, 2012 9:15 am
That's what Vallas SAID was the reason (school violence) for opening more K-8 schools. The reality is that, once you combine the elementary schools with the middle schools, you dramatically increase the likelihood that the 'new' K-8 will NOT make AYP, thereby ensuring that the school will be subject to sanctions (closure, turnaround...)
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on December 16, 2012 10:03 am
the "die was cast".....dissertation? Did you proof your work?
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on December 16, 2012 1:57 pm
The real reason for eliminating middle schools was that Philadelphia could never get enough certified teachers to teach there. The PA Dept. of Ed. had given them a deadline to make sure all the middle school teachers were certified and they weren't going to reach it. So instead they dumped the middle school kids into the elementaries which disrupted instruction in those grades as well. Bully elementary teachers into middle grade positions.
Submitted by anonymous (not verified) on December 17, 2012 2:48 pm
Who is making money and how? Please be specific. Name names. Paul Socolar, you said a while back that the Notebook would not tolerate unsubstantiated accusations in comments and yet I continually read this fiction about people getting rich, but with no attribution and no specifics. Can you please clarify the Notebook's editorial position here??
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on December 17, 2012 3:19 pm
Any administrator in a charter school/- who is already collecting a pension- can legally collect a salary from the charter school. Not sure about teachers in this situation. To me this presents two problems: A brain drain for the current public schools. What amounts to what used to be called "double dipping". Can the notebook comment on this? This seems to be an area that needs a thorough investigative review. Please correct me if I am wrong (as I agree that unsubstantiated info taints an issue ). Face it, there is an abundance of substantiated horror happening. No need to make things up. I was given this information by a charter employee in the know.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on December 15, 2012 3:03 pm
Is the video of the community meeting going to be posted? (I know it was streaming.)
Submitted by Paul Socolar on December 15, 2012 4:22 pm

The District says it will do that after each meeting. 

http://webgui.phila.k12.pa.us/offices/f/facilities-master-plan/community-forums

This was a passionate one.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on December 15, 2012 5:58 pm
Agreed, and thank you for the link. I'll be updating to collect some of the footage of our kids at UCHS. They made me very proud.
Submitted by George Gibson (not verified) on August 21, 2013 2:09 am
As corruption takes place at every where all employee or employer comes under this circumstance. If a leader also comes under this then the aim of the organization can't achieved and it will impossible for a leader to do his/her duty effectively. Life coach orlando
Submitted by Marines (not verified) on October 30, 2013 5:32 am

Its quiet impressive

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

Read the latest print issue

 

Philly Ed Feed

Become a Notebook member

 

Recent Comments

Top

Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300
notebook@thenotebook.org

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy