Please Join Today!
view counter

No change in 12th-grade performance on NAEP math, reading

By the Notebook on May 7, 2014 09:45 AM

by Liana Heitin for Education Week

High school seniors' performance in mathematics and reading has stagnated since 2009, according to a new round of results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress.

The achievement data from NAEP, known as "the nation's report card," show that 12th graders' average math score remained at 153, on a 300-point scale, when comparing the 2013 results with those from 2009, the last time the test was administered. Just 26 percent of students scored at or above the proficient level in math — again, the same as four years ago.

In reading, the national average stayed flat at 288, on a 500-point scale, with 37 percent of students scoring at or above proficient, according to the new NAEP report, issued May 7.

NAEP results are reported at three achievement levels: basic, proficient, and advanced. Proficient, for NAEP purposes, means students "have had success with the challenging content on that grade level," said Cornelia Orr, the executive director of the National Assessment Governing Board, during a May 6 media call.

A nationally representative sample of about 92,000 12th graders took the test between January and March of 2013.

While scores in math and reading remain unchanged compared with four years ago, the national average for reading decreased by four points since the test's first administration in 1992. In math, scores have increased by three points since 2005, when a new test framework was introduced. Results from before that time are not considered valid for comparison.

John Easton, the acting commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics, which administers the NAEP, said that since 1992, graduation rates have increased from 74 percent to 81 percent of students in a freshman class. For that reason, he said, the recent testing sample "includes more lower-performing students who would have dropped out in the past."

In addition, the rates of students identified with disabilities and as English learners have gone up, and exclusion rates for the test have gone down. The percentage of white students has declined from 74 percent to 58 percent, and the Hispanic population has grown from 7 percent to 20 percent. (The population of black students has remained steady.)

However, Mr. Easton emphasized, "Our 12th-grade population is our 12th-grade population, and we don't explain away test scores based on demographics."

Achievement gaps persist

When viewed by gender and race/ethnicity, both the math and reading scores have also remained unchanged since 2009, indicating that achievement gaps have persisted. The black-white gap continues to be the largest one, with black students scoring about 30 points below their white peers on both tests in 2013. Looked at another way, in reading, 47 percent of white students scored proficient or above, compared with 16 percent of black students. And in math, 33 percent of white students scored proficient or above, while only 7 percent of black students did the same.

Here's a chart from the National Center for Education Statistics showing proficiency rates in math by race and ethnicity:


naep proficiency 12th 2013.JPG

Further, the score gap in reading between black and white students has increased by 5 points since 1992.

U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said in a statement about the results, "We project that our nation's public schools will become majority-minority this fall — making it even more urgent to put renewed attention into the academic rigor and equity of course offerings and into efforts to redesign high schools. We must reject educational stagnation in our high schools, and as [a] nation, we must do better for all students, especially for African-American and Latino students."

This is the second time NAEP has included results at grade 12 from individual states as part of a pilot program. States are required to participate in NAEP testing for 4th and 8th grades in order to receive federal aid under the No Child Left Behind Act. Starting in 2009, states could volunteer to receive individual state-based results at grade 12.

Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, South Dakota, and West Virginia all participated in both 2009 and 2013. This year, Tennessee and Michigan also participated.

Of the 11 states that received scores in 2009 as well, four showed improvement in math: Arkansas, Connecticut, Idaho, and West Virginia. Two states — Arkansas and Connecticut — showed improvement in average reading scores over the last four years.

Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, and South Dakota outperformed the national average in both math and reading in 2013.

Connecticut had the highest percentage of students score at or above the proficient level in reading in 2013, with 50 percent. In math, Massachusetts had the highest percentage of those at or above proficient, with 34 percent.

Common Core connection

With new tests aligned to the Common Core State Standards set to debut next year, many people are wondering whether NAEP offers any clues as to how high school students will perform. Ms. Orr from the National Assessment Governing Board, which sets policy for NAEP, called that "the million-dollar question."

"How will [the two testing consortia] report scores out in terms of scales and proficiency levels, and how will those align with the NAEP scores in terms of proficiency levels — all of that is yet unknown," she said. Even so, an initial review found that the NAEP test items are "quite closely aligned with the Common Core content."

Ms. Orr added that next week the governing board plans to release its first report on what NAEP results can say about how prepared students are for endeavors beyond 12th grade.


This article originally appeared at Education Week.

Click Here
view counter

Comments (1)

Submitted by Rich Migliore (not verified) on May 8, 2014 10:01 am
It is a time to put an end to the insanity of high stakes testing and its misuses. It is also time to go back to norm referenced testing and end the ridiculous and arbitrary classifications used today as they are meaningless cut offs which are not consistent from test to test. Can anyone in America even begin to explain what the term "proficiency" means in reading and math in actual behavioral terms? And do not even try to say that it means "reading on grade level," because that is not what those tests measure at all.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

Read the latest print issue

Philly Ed Feed

Recent Comments


Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy