Paid Advertisement
view counter

SRC issues another statement on the BRT - but we're not sure why

By Helen Gym on May 8, 2009 04:59 PM

In a day marked by posturing and political one-upmanship, Chairman Robert Archie of the School Reform Commission yesterday issued yet another bland press release about  . . . well, I'm not sure what about:

English Only…Not

By Debbie Wei on May 8, 2009 09:57 AM

This may be the only country in the world where knowing more than one language is considered as a bad thing.

I just read an ASCD blog about how ELLs are doing in Boston ever since the public passed a referendum to make sheltered immersion (throw them in and give them English only for support) as the default program for ELL’s in Boston.

To quote the blog:

Mayor to School District: BRT positions are up to you!

By Helen Gym on May 7, 2009 12:49 PM

UPDATE: The Notebook contacted BRT spokesperson Kevin Feeley this afternoon, who confirmed that the School District has "funding authority" over the 80 BRT clerks scheduled into the SRC payroll. When asked what would happen if the District chose to eliminate funding for the BRT positions, Feeley responded: "If there is no funding then there is no funding." - Public School Notebook (5:36 p.m.)

Money, money everywhere--looking at the BRT and School District budget

By Erika Owens on May 6, 2009 11:49 AM

The School District budget book has been up for less than one day and the details of District spending are already creating quite a discussion. There's been a lot of activity around the BRT positions, but what about other parts of the budget?

Paul Socolar posted about the School District budget book last night. It included details about the BRT patronage positions that Helen Gym blogged about earlier this week. Read Len Rieser's post for an education law take on this discussion--is the School District even allowed to spend money on these positions?

Do you have any thoughts, tips about these budget issues? What are we missing when sifting through that gigantic document?

UPDATE: Mayor Nutter weighs in on BRT positions.

Searching for a missing bit of law

By Len Rieser on May 6, 2009 10:55 AM

So now we know, from the Inquirer and the Notebook, that the School District– involuntarily, to be sure – spends $4.56 million per year on salaries and benefits for 80 employees of the Bureau of Revision of Taxes. Which made me wonder: where's the law that gives the District the authority to spend all that money on these folks? 

Not for wonks only

By Paul Socolar on May 5, 2009 08:10 PM

The 349-page budget book with details of spending, department-by-department, is now up on the School District's Web site, just in time for the first community meetings, which are today and tomorrow at Girls' High and Sayre. 

Yes, it's big and hard to understand, but I encourage you all to take a few minutes and see whether you can make some sense out of some or all of this document, and post comments about what you discover.

The BRT and Your School District Dollars NOT at work

By Helen Gym on May 4, 2009 10:19 AM

If you haven’t read the Inquirer’s unfolding saga of corruption at the Bureau of Revision of Taxes (BRT), check it out here.

Why should parents care about patronage and corruption at this city agency? For starters, almost 40% of the BRT employees sit on the School District’s payroll. To clarify: that’s between 78-85 employees, neither hired nor supervised by the District, working off-site, many of whom hold political positions that would not be permissible by city ethics laws, and complicit in an agency that seems to be rife with political favoritism – all the while, costing the District around $4 million a year.

Arne Duncan tells Education Writers Association: NCLB has to go (the name, not the law)

By Dale Mezzacappa on May 1, 2009 06:34 PM

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan addressed the annual convention of the Education Writers Association in Washington, DC Thursday night, and he said that the name "No Child Left Behind" has to go.

"The name 'No Child Left Behind' is toxic," he said.

In case you missed it Apr. 26 - May 1

By Erika Owens on May 1, 2009 05:35 PM

The Notebook has a couple of new features this week--a new section of our blog, Eye on the Budget, and the May Newsflash about increasing graduation rates in Philadelphia.

The big question

By Paul Socolar on Apr 30, 2009 04:50 PM

Of the questions raised by the District's plans for allocating their massive $314 million increase in spending next school year, one seems paramount.

Now that the District has a strategic plan guiding its next five years, why is such a small fraction of the new spending being driven by or devoted to the priorities of the plan?

Fines for truancy: another band-aid on a gaping wound

By Eric Braxton on Apr 29, 2009 10:15 AM

The city is about to start issuing fines to parents whose students skip school.  I know a lot of people like this plan.  They say it will help catch the attention of parents.  They say we need to hold parents accountable.  While I think those ideas are fine, and I’m not that worried that $25 fines are going to ruin anyone, my reaction is, is this really the best we can come up with to solve a major crisis in our city? 

We may not get another chance like this

By Paul Socolar on Apr 28, 2009 12:04 AM

[Updated May 7 based on revised budget documents]

Last week, the School District provided the first details on how it plans to spend the additional $314 million it anticipates having next year.

Yes, that number is $314 million.

Election Day is not a School Holiday

By Helen Gym on Apr 27, 2009 09:41 AM

As a parent, I’ve never been a fan of the policy to close school on election days – a ridiculous practice that has been going on since the Vallas administration. But the latest news that the city is forcing schools to add two extra days to the school calendar because they want to close schools for the May 19th election has me particularly irritated.

In case you missed it, Apr. 19-24

By Erika Owens on Apr 24, 2009 04:24 PM

Approval of Superintedent Ackerman's Imagine 2014 strategic plan is the news of the week. You can check our Breaking news section for ongoing updates about the plan, or check here for a list of all of our coverage related to Imagine 2014.

What happened behind closed doors?

By Helen Gym on Apr 24, 2009 11:40 AM

Anytime the District has to rally a line-up of politicians to testify on its behalf, you know something’s up.

On Wednesday night, a group of political heavy-hitters opened the School Reform Commission meeting to urge the SRC to vote in favor of the District’s controversial strategic planImagine 2014. Meanwhile CEO Arlene Ackerman issued dramatic statements that emphasized just how much pressure the District was exerting on the SRC for its vote:

"Tonight is the night that we demonstrate to [children] that we care . . . Tonight is the night the School Reform Commission acts on behalf of all of our children," Ackerman said during the meeting, which drew a capacity audience to the District's headquarters on Broad Street near Spring Garden.

Follow Us On


Philly Ed Feed

Print edition

Recent Comments

Click Here
view counter
Click Here - Paid Ad
view counter
Click Here
view counter
Universal Family of School is Recruiting Talented Teachers
view counter

view counter
Click Here
view counter
Keystone State Education Coalition
view counter
Click Here
view counter
Click here
view counter
Advertise with
view counter
Click Here
view counter
Reserve your ad in the next edition of The Notebook
view counter

Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy