The Notebook

Click here
view counter
Other news & features

Renaissance redux

Four of the 10 teams looking to "turn around" a second group of low-performing schools are familiar; others are newcomers. Here's a look.

by Benjamin Herold
Photo: Benjamin Herold

ASPIRA of PA now runs Stetson Middle School and is interested in taking on additional schools.

After managing a relatively smooth transition of seven low-performing public schools into neighborhood charters, all four of the School District of Philadelphia's current "turnaround teams" have been invited back to compete for more schools during the second round of the Renaissance Schools initiative.

But this year, they will face an expanded pool of competitors, including three new providers with national profiles.

"We proactively reached out to national organizations and encouraged them to apply," said District spokesperson Fernando Gallard. "We believe the transparency we strived to achieve in the first year of the Renaissance Schools process gave national organizations a good perspective on working with the District."

Included in this year's crop of 10 approved candidates is Mosaica Turnaround Partners, a division of New York-based for-profit education management organization Mosaica Education, which currently operates more than 80 schools. Also new is Green Dot America, a nonprofit attempting to go national with the reform model used in 17 Green Dot charter schools in Los Angeles, New York, and Chicago.

The District has moved its deadlines up this year. During the first round of the Renaissance process, the District did not identify "Renaissance-eligible" schools until late January and did not request full proposals from "pre-qualified" turnaround teams until late March. This year, there is more time in each stage of the process, although the District has not yet revealed when the next batch of "Renaissance-eligible" schools will be made public.

The District has also not announced how these schools will be selected this time. Last year, the District used its school performance index to identify the lowest-performing schools in the city and target them for turnaround.

So far, District officials have given positive reviews to the efforts of the initial four turnaround teams – ASPIRA of PA, Mastery Charter Schools, Universal Companies, and the newly renamed Scholar Academies.

"We were very impressed" with how they have done so far in round one, said District Associate Superintendent Diane Castelbuono, who is part of a team that has done regular site visits at each school. "They have really developed some nice school cultures." The seven schools are "visually and physically nicer places," she added.

In testimony before the School Reform Commission on November 17, Scholar Academies CEO Lars Beck claimed early success at Young Scholars-Frederick Douglass Elementary School.

"Our enrollment increases and low attrition rates are a big sign" of success, said Beck. "We're [also] seeing early signs of academic progress. In our first round of interim benchmarks, we're seeing higher than expected levels of standards mastery."

Spokesperson Gallard said that while the "prequalification" of all four existing providers to compete for more schools amounted to a preliminary endorsement of the groups' capacity to take on additional schools, each group's full proposal would be needed to make a final determination.

"We're excited," said Alfredo Calderon, executive director of ASPIRA, which now manages Stetson Middle School. "We know we can do more than one school, but it depends where the schools are. We have made a commitment to Eastern North Philadelphia."

The 10 prequalified turnaround teams now must submit full proposals to the District, due on December 21. Finalists are to be selected on January 17.

Rounding out the field of 10 are two local organizations, Esperanza Academy and Foundations, Inc., and two additional candidates from outside of Philadelphia.

New York-based Global Partnership Schools, Inc. is a for-profit company headed by Manny Rivera, a former superintendent in Rochester, N.Y., and former member of the management team at Edison Schools, Inc.

About the Author

Freelance writer Benjamin Herold covers Renaissance Schools for the Notebook.

Comments (4)

Submitted by Robert D. Skeels (not verified) on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 14:28.

Your district would be well served looking at Green Dot's real record...

Steve Barr and Marco Petruzzi's Green Dot corporate charter-voucher establishment in Los Angeles, like all EMO/CMO factory schools, have been a paradigm of parent and student disenfranchisement. The recent definitive studies citing charter school racism (http://http://bit.ly/8RRuaZ), not to mention discrimination and exclusivity toward children with special needs and students with disabilities (http://bit.ly/5LHf2j) are further proof that the decades long failed experiment of the corporate CMO supporters must end. The previous two studies don't address the activities of Green Dot's former LAPU/PR division, tasked with increasing their market share, which have been documented in at least two articles (http://bit.ly/4e78Sm), (http://bit.ly/5Dndws) as class and race baiting.

Green Dot spends 1.2 million on outsourced, non-union security at Locke, already resulting in several incidents of violence and racial profiling (http://j.mp/hj1zSL and http://j.mp/4F3N5n), but spends precious little on student achievement. Despite all the sycophantic media hype, Green Dot Public [sic] Schools underperform public schools like LAUSD's in many regards. For example, Green Dot sports three schools in the lowest 100 APIs in the County. They also feature five schools in the lowest 35 average SAT scores in the County (http://projects.latimes.com/schools/). Let's look at Animo Venice Charter High School, which isn't one of the schools just mentioned. Of the Green Dot students admitted to the CSU system in 2008 67% WERE NOT PROFICIENT IN MATHEMATICS. This is compared to just 49% of the much maligned LAUSD students. Moreover, only 33% of the children graduating the Green Dot corporate factory school were proficient, while children attending public schools comprised a much more respectable 51% (http://www.asd.calstate.edu/scripts/hsrem08/hsrem08.idc?campus=199683).

Green Dot teachers' average experience, while marginally higher than the CMO average of 2 years, is still less than 3 years. This in turn probably explains Green Dot's dismal performance discussed above, despite all the advantages it holds in extra funding, motivated parents, and exclusion of ELL and special education children. If Green Dot represents what Education Secretary Arne Duncan thinks is best, it's further proof he isn't qualified to hold his post, as if his own abject failure of Renaissance 2010 (http://bit.ly/Fpde7) wasn't damning evidence enough.

The real question is, what will we all do once these profit hungry charter-voucher schools stop getting extra funding from ideologically charged plutocrats and hedge fund managers? Instead of addressing any real problems, these poverty pimps are stealing the last of the public commons under our noses in the guise of reform. We all deserve better than to see public education discarded as a way to creating the next big bubble.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 12/04/2010 - 13:43.

I usually regret scrolling to the bottom to read the comments section of Notebook articles, but this raises the crazy bar to a whole new level. People, please take your medication before you spend the time to share a manifesto.

Submitted by Philadelphia Citizen (not verified) on Sat, 12/04/2010 - 14:33.

Skeels makes important points, especially when he refers to what's happening to "the last of the public commons." Do you also think Diane Ravitch is a crazy (for example, her essay in the New York Review of Books, http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/nov/11/myth-charter-schools)?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 12/05/2010 - 13:50.

If you disagree with Skeets then why haven't you posted facts to support your own beliefs. Belittling anyone that disagrees with a particular agenda is a tactic that administration and management uses too often to try to silence whistleblowers. Maybe you ought to make sure your own meds are in order before accusing others.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Table of Contents

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

 

Philly Ed Feed

Top

Public School Notebook

3721 Midvale Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19129
Phone: (215) 951-0330, ext. 2107
Fax: (215) 951-0342
notebook@thenotebook.org

© Copyright 2012 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy