'Doing' multicultural education is continuing a struggle for democracy
by Shauna Brown
In big and small ways, people throughout Philadelphia and the country are “doing” multicultural education in efforts to improve the quality of education in our schools.
Yet rarely do people reflect about what it means to “do” multicultural education well and why it is integral to good teaching and learning.
The terms multiculturalism and multicultural education have been used in so many contexts that one can easily dismiss them as buzz words that simply encourage the affirmation of our diversity.
But at its core, multicultural education is much more complex. Like the civil rights movement that spawned it, multicultural education is a process, a collective struggle to uphold the nation’s democratic ideals in our schools.
It is at the heart of all comprehensive strategies for building robust and rigorous educational environments that improve teaching and learning by honoring, respecting, and nurturing students as well as the experiences, cultures, learning styles, and critical perspectives that they bring to their classrooms.
Contrary to popular belief, multicultural education “is not special or compensatory education – it’s just good education,” explains Enid Lee, an advocate for multicultural and anti-racist education.
It strives to provide a more complete, multifaceted view of the world in which the perspective of white European males is one of many, and the voices of “others” move closer to the center.
The quarterly journal Rethinking Schools defines multicultural education as “an ongoing process of questioning, revising, and struggling to create greater equity in every nook and cranny of school life – whether in curriculum materials, school staffing policies, discipline procedures, teaching strategies, or course offerings. It is a fight against racism and other forms of oppression, including those based on gender, religion, sexual orientation, physical ability, or national origin and language. It is a fight for economic and social justice.”
That fight is central to the current educational debates here in Philadelphia, where political leaders have said in word and deed that the “status quo” in Philadelphia schools is unacceptable. In this period of school change, a focus on multicultural education is critically important.
Throughout the District, courageous students and teachers have been using the concepts of multicultural education to challenge the status quo. Their actions are sanctioned by the District’s Policy 102 (see Policy 102: the District’s stated commitment to equity for all), which identifies educational equity for all students as a goal.
The student organization Youth United for Change (YUC) provides one example of those who “do” multicultural education. They view multiculturalism as a way to break down the barriers between schools and the rest of the world and to make the substance of education more relevant to students.
YUC is an organization of high school students at four of Philadelphia’s neighborhood high schools. The organization itself is rooted in multicultural practices, such as affirming diverse student voices, providing learning opportunities for students with different learning styles, and organizing to fight for social justice in education.
They also talk explicitly about issues of race, class, and power and how they affect what goes on in their lives.
YUC student leader Derrick Smith of Olney High School wishes that there was more of that in school.
“I think if you could have somewhere you could talk with a group of people who face the same problems that you do, a lot of things
wouldn’t be going on that are going on now,” he says.
“But you’re not given that opportunity, that space to talk about your problems, and to talk about the problems in society, so you continue to bundle it up. . . . [If] we had a class where students could have a lengthy discussion on how everyone feels and get it all out in the open, I think it would be good for students.”
Smith would call that class “Social Change.”