Paid Advertisement
view counter

Fall 2005 Vol. 13. No. 1 Focus on Out-of-School Youth

Theme articles

New efforts to stem flow of dropouts from Philadelphia schools

While an accurate count is still not available, thousands each year are leaving school

By by Paul Socolar

Young people in Philadelphia who have left school have most likely experienced one of the defining features of the city's massive dropout problem – the invisibility of out-of-school youth.

Dozens of former students interviewed for this edition of the Notebook said that nobody from their school pursued them when they stopped attending. Some said they got letters or automatic voicemails, but few had any personal contact with the school after leaving.

So not surprisingly, with this lack of follow-up, there is much uncertainty about how many students drop out annually. (The latest official count of some 5,000 Philadelphia dropouts in 2003-04 is widely assumed to be missing hundreds, if not thousands of students.)

“They didn't send me any letters. They didn't call me,” said Sadata (last name withheld), who left Gratz High School in 11th grade and was interviewed this summer at a GED program at Youth Empowerment Services in North Philadelphia. She concluded that her school did not even know she had stopped attending.

For some young people, the sense of invisibility starts early in high school when they conclude they can cut class and nobody seems to care.

“For two weeks, I didn't go to school, and when you're absent for ten days they just drop you off the roll,” said Carlisha, 16, who used to attend Washington High. “So I was like, 'Screw it, I ain't going back, I'm dropped off the roll.”

An overlooked issue

Laura Shubilla, who heads up the Philadelphia Youth Network and is now coordinating a local partnership on this issue, noticed the low profile of out-of-school youth from her own vantage point in youth service and advocacy work.

In meetings, Shubilla noted that until recently, “out-of-school youth were always kind of tacked on at the end of an agenda. It was much easier to talk about in-school youth because there was a framework and there was a system and there were places to go to get information.”

But slowly the issue started garnering more attention locally, and then this year a major grant from three national funders – the Gates Foundation, Carnegie Corporation, and Charles Stewart Mott Foundation – served as a catalyst, activating a broad citywide partnership of local organizations and officials to tackle the dropout issue collaboratively.

The funders emphasized a dual focus on reforming high schools while reconnecting out-of-school youth with education opportunities.

This recent grant from the “Youth Transition Funders Group” calls for the new Philadelphia collaborative to improve data collection and data sharing among agencies, develop policy papers, increase the quantity and quality of educational options, and build public awareness and grassroots activism. Groups that came to the table ranged from the School District to the University of Pennsylvania to the Eastern Pennsylvania Organizing Project.

A profile of the city's out-of-school youth has begun to emerge from the data. It is a racially diverse population, but about 60 percent male. Most students who have withdrawn from the School District did not make it past ninth or 10th grade. Many repeated a grade. This profile could be broadened to include some 15,000 “part-time out-of-school youth” who are chronically truant.

But months into this effort to compile data, it is still difficult to get a handle on the size of the population of out-of-school youth or on what proportion of its students the School District loses every year. Some estimate a third of students don't make it through high schools, while others say losses are as high as one half.

This problem is by no means unique to Philadelphia. A 2004 study by Robert Balfanz and Nettie Letgers of Johns Hopkins University found that at as many as 1,000 high schools in the country, “graduating is at best a 50/50 proposition.”

The researchers found these schools by looking for high schools with poor “promoting power” – schools where so few students make it to senior year that they have fewer than half as many seniors as freshmen.

“The nation's dropout factories are overwhelmingly the province of minority students,” the researchers observed. They found that nearly half of the nation's African American students and 40 percent of its Latino students attend schools in which most students fail to graduate. Whites and Asian Americans are least likely to attend such schools.

Good news, bad news

In Philadelphia, the School District's graduation rate trends are clearly positive – the recently reported 2004 rate climbed to 69 percent, representing a gain of 10 points within three years. Over just a two-year period, the District has seen an 1,800-student increase in the size of its graduating class citywide.

Because most observers maintain that the dropout figures used to determine District graduation rates are understated, the rate probably presents too rosy a picture.

However, CEO Paul Vallas said he is optimistic that the rate will continue to improve due to Philadelphia students being better prepared entering high schools and due to the creation of more small schools in the system.

Flying in the face of this increasing graduation rate, a recent study points to an alarming rise in the number of “disconnected youth” in Philadelphia – defined as youth aged 16-24 who are neither in school nor employed. In 2004, there were 52,000 disconnected youth in Philadelphia, an increase of over 14,000 in just four years, according to Northeastern University researcher Paul Harrington.

About the Author

Contact Notebook editor Paul Socolar at or 215-951-0330, ext. 2107.

Comments (1)

Submitted by Bill Betzen (not verified) on September 2, 2009 1:35 am

Counting dropouts and determining dropout rates is only an issue for those who know the truth and want to keep it hidden. If that is not true then why do not school and school districts publish a simple spreadsheet on their web sites that give the enrollment by grade for each school year and the number of diplomas given out each year and allow those annual columns of figures to build up and go back over 20 years? That is a VERY simple solution that will quickly expose the dropout rate. If there are 1000 in the 9th grade and only 300 diplomas given out when that same class graduates, what should the graduation rate be? We can call it the "raw" graduation rate as it is not "corrected" by all the exceptions schools want to pile in to improve their dropout figures. If there are large population flucuations, such as a school district loosing 5% of the population due to a major employer leaving, that could be added as a footnote.

Once you have determined the dropout rate then the dropout cure can be secured by focusing your students onto their own futures in a credible manner. Google the two words "dropout" and "cure." The first hit will show you a $2 per student program that will lower dropout rates over 25%.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Table of Contents

Read the latest print issue


Philly Ed Feed

Become a Notebook member



Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy