Menu
Paid Advertisement
view counter

Fall Guide 2012 Vol. 20. No. 1 Looking Ahead to High School

Theme articles

Choosing a high school keeps getting more complicated

Expect a wave of school closings, more new charters, a new tax credit – and fewer counselors to help sort it all out.

By By Dale Mezzacappa on Sep 26, 2012 01:08 AM
Photo: Harvey Finkle

Mayor Nutter says he wants to see "a system of great schools," however they are managed.

The always daunting process of getting into high school has a new twist this year.

In a system where studies have found that parents are already befuddled by the process, students and their families have a dizzying array of high school choices – small schools, large schools, themed schools, charter schools, themed charter schools, neighborhood schools that have become charter schools – the list goes on.

This year, however, students and families will be choosing high schools at the same time the District undertakes a process that could result in a dozen or more of them closing down.

Today, there are 89 regular public high school options in Philadelphia: 54 run by the District and 35 charters.

Come next September, there could be many fewer as the District embarks on a massive downsizing designed to shed underutilized buildings as a strategy to maintain its solvency. It’s the continuation of a process that saw three District high schools close this year. What’s ahead will likely include the closings of both newer small high schools and some of the huge, iconic buildings that have dominated neighborhoods for generations.

Plus, there is the ever-present uncertainty about how drastically relentless funding cuts will affect programs in the remaining District-run and charter schools.

Emblematic of the problem: In the spring, the city’s premiere performing arts high school, CAPA, had to scramble for outside funds to stage its annual musical.

For parents and students seeking a high school for the coming year, this turmoil only means more anxiety in a process already fraught with obstacles and risks of missed opportunities.

Stakes are high because so many of the city’s District and charter schools still perform poorly. None of the city’s 26 neighborhood high schools and only 11 charters graduate 75 percent or more of their students within four years (see p. 20-21).

“It’s a very scary process,” said Laverne Bess, the mother of an eighth grader.

District officials stress preparedness.

“It is incumbent on parents to research all the choices and do a deep dive,” said Danielle Seward, the District’s deputy chief for student enrollment and placement who offers this advice as the parent of a 1st grader herself.

New paradigm

Overall, District, city and philanthropic leaders are touting a new paradigm that downplays the public-private distinction in favor of “quality seats.”

Boston Consulting Group, brought in to help the District plan with its severely downsized budget, recommended that it close between 29 and 57 schools by 2017, including 15 to 19 high schools. It said that high schools are at 59 percent capacity, with 85 percent being the ideal.

And it urged the District to start immediately by shuttering dozens of schools by fall 2013.

The timeline means that for students applying this year, some may select schools that won’t exist when they start 9th grade.

“We will make the necessary accommodations if there are students affected” by closures,” said District spokesman Fernando Gallard.

BCG proposed making better use of bigger buildings by expanding some high schools to grades 7 through 12 instead of closing them. But so far the public has no clue what new Superintendent William Hite and the School Reform Commission will do.

At the same time, BCG and the commission are forecasting that 40 percent of the District’s students will be educated in charters by 2017.

This is partly because the SRC has been turning over District schools to charter operators, as well as expanding the number of charter seats in high schools, mostly notably authorizing a 1,400-student performing arts school to be operated by String Theory. The SRC did also move to shut down three small charter high schools. Hope Charter will close in 2013; Truebright and Arise Academy are fighting the decision.

Three neighborhood high schools – Olney, Audenried, and Gratz – are now charters, converted under the Renaissance Schools turnaround initiative launched by former Superintendent Arlene Ackerman.

Ackerman wasn’t the first to outsource troubled District schools for turnaround. Former CEO Paul Vallas ceded three middle schools to Mastery Charter Schools, which has added grades and converted them to middle-high schools. They also have their own catchment areas, but accept students from outside.

This may seem confusing, but it is part of a game-changing approach to school reform, focused on increasing “high-performing seats” and shedding low-performing ones.

Private schools enter the portfolio

District and city leaders have made clear that their strategy for school improvement is based on supporting “schools of excellence” regardless who runs them – a “system of great schools” instead of a “school system,” in the words of SRC Chair Pedro Ramos and Mayor Nutter

In August, Nutter declared that the traditional demarcation between public and private in the education world has blurred.

He said debates around public vs. private schools and school management are “esoteric” and “ultimately don’t mean anything to … young people.”

What is important, he said, is “a system of great schools where parents get to make a decision. … If you want to go to public school, wonderful, if you want to go to Catholic school, great, if you want to go to private school, to religious school … go wherever you want.”

About the Author

Contact Dale Mezzacappa at dalem@thenotebook.org.

Comments (3)

Submitted by Rich Migliore (not verified) on September 26, 2012 2:07 pm

The public vs private school issue is not an "esoteric" issue at all. It goes to the very heart and essence of what public education means and the legal duties of those who are entrusted with the well being of children and our community.

Public education is a "public trust" and our students, their families and our community are the beneficiaries of that public trust. The legal duties of our representatives, whether elected or appointed, go to the beneficiaries of that public trust. It is not a private trust.

Charter schools by law are required to operate as public schools and not as private entities. The law, and our Constitution, is not esoteric or optional -- it is mandatory.

There is a legal reason why charter boards are boards of "trustees." It is because they manage a trust that is a public trust. Our Courts have already made it clear -- that the board of trustees of charter schools have the singular duty to manage their schools for the sole purpose of the best interests of its pupils.

Democracy is not esoteric. We have a legal duty and a moral duty to see that all students get a good education regardless of the sophistication of their parents and guardians and regardless of their talents and disabilities. FAPE has not disappeared.

The issues of the privatization of the American schoolhouse are crucial national issues which go to the heart of what America is and will become. I find it just amazing that in the birthplace of American democracy, we have one of the least democratically governed public school systems in the nation. That issue is not esoteric. It is deeply meaningful to us all....

It is time for all of us to "think deeply" about what we are doing.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on September 30, 2012 7:58 am

Yes, education is a public trust.

Which is why it should be kept as far away from the band of DROP collecting, tax-cheat enabling, favor peddling, self-enriching criminals on city council as possible.

Seriously, you wish the School District could be run like the Sheriff's office, or PHA, or PRA, DRPA, or the other public "trusts" that are so exploited by our Democratic representatives for the benefit of their well connected friends and interest groups. This at the expense of the VOTING citizenry.

This idea that Philly's machine pols will serve children above all others, is absurd on its face. Children have neither votes nor money to contribute to the machine.

Submitted by moncler 70 sconto (not verified) on November 22, 2013 6:29 am
Ford Bag is still among the list of fashion leaders in inventive fields like footwear, watches, jewellery and so forth. Having a 150-year lengthy background and advanced craftwork and techniques, low cost Tom Ford Bags on line carries on to building brand value. At the very same time, guided by a vacation philosophy of delicacy, high high-quality and easeful, it re-appears new vitality by combining original with modern day..

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Read the latest print issue

 

Philly Ed Feed

Stopping Summer Slide

 

Top

Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300
notebook@thenotebook.org

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy