The Notebook

Click here
view counter
Other news & features

Teacher contract is signed; 'Real work begins now'

New language calls for revamping teacher evaluation and rewarding staff at high-performing schools.

by Dale Mezzacappa

The contract negotiated between the District and the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers has been hailed as a major step forward, with words like “groundbreaking,” “historic,” “transformative,” and “bold vision.”

But whether it advances the cause of education reform in Philadelphia will depend on how well the union and administration are able to work together to implement some of its more far-reaching provisions.

“The real work begins now,” said Mayor Michael Nutter.

PFT President Jerry Jordan said he wants to create a real partnership. Despite a past history of administration-union distrust, he said, “I’m not going into this with any kind of negativity. When you look at districts that have begun to improve student achievement, they never do that without collaboration between the union and administration.”

The contract expands teacher site selection so schools have more control over hiring, revamps the teacher evaluation process, allows for more focused professional development, and – funding permitting – provides extra compensation to the staffs in high-performing schools.

It also gives the District latitude to “turn around” low-performing schools with new staff by imposing forced transfers on all teachers at so-called Renaissance Schools. The turnaround teams in charge of these schools will be required to implement a longer school day and year, among other changes. Teachers will be paid for the extra time.

The pact establishes joint committees to work out the details of the new teacher evaluation process, called Peer Assistance and Review (PAR), which will be mandatory for new teachers and for tenured teachers who are rated unsatisfactory. The system will be phased in over three years.

A joint District-union committee will work out the details. Jordan said he had already made his appointments and expects it to move forward expeditiously.

Other committees will work on school safety and on “value-added” compensation.

“We didn’t get everything we had hoped for, but this is a transformational contract … and a product of truly collaborative effort on both sides,” said School Reform Commission member David Girard-diCarlo, expressing a sentiment shared by his colleagues. “Now, the trick is to execute it well.”

Despite some vocal opposition, the PFT ratified the contract by a two-to-one margin on January 20, and the SRC gave its unanimous approval on January 27.

PAR is designed to replace what is now an ineffective teacher evaluation process in which nearly every teacher attains tenure and is rated satisfactory. Under this process, teachers will play a major role in assessing and helping their peers.

“This is a leap for all of us,” said Dee Phillips, a vice president of the union whom Jordan appointed to the PAR committee. “We’re bringing in professionalism, and having teachers help teachers more than ever before.”

Advocacy groups were for the most part supportive.

The Effective Teaching for Every Child campaign, a coalition of 25 organizations from the NAACP to the Philadelphia Education Fund (PEF), gave the contract generally high marks, but said there were not enough incentives to address harmful teacher turnover in some of the neediest schools.

Still, Carol Fixman of PEF told the SRC, the contract “addresses some significant issues … that the District has been trying to address for years.”

She said inclusion of rewards for the entire staff in successful schools rather than a focus on rewarding individual teachers is an “enormous step forward” because “it will encourage teachers as a team to improve schools.”

The campaign had hoped for full site selection, in which teacher vacancies are filled by the school instead of through seniority. The contract expands site selection significantly, by mandating it in more than 100 of the lowest performing schools, but doesn’t make it universal – leaving a very complicated process for hiring and placing teachers.

About the Author

Contact Notebook contributing editor Dale Mezzacappa.

Comments (4)

Submitted by dkbog (not verified) on Thu, 02/04/2010 - 12:13.

"Will not favor inside applications over outside ones"--Yeas, Queen Arlene wants every school to become Charter Schools and the wimpy PFT needs to pay attention to this.
"Bonuses will be given IF there is additional money"--That equals there won't be any left to give--Jerry Jordan fell for this one.
"Teachers can become Forced Transferred if they choose"--Problem is there will not be enough schools for teachers to go to.
Bottom line---MASS RETIREMENTS, MASS NEWLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS WILL FLOCK TO THE SUBURBS, MASS CURRENT TEACHERS WILL FIND OTHER PROFESSIONS OR GO OUT ON STRESS LEAVE OR FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE (DISTRICT CAN'T DO A THING ABOUT IT) AND THIS WHOLE REFORM DID NOT WORK IN CHICAGO.
WHY DON'T YOU PUT THIS IN YOUR ARTICLE INSTEAD OF MAKING THIS LOOK LIKE ONE BIG GREAT THING???

Submitted by Erika Owens on Thu, 02/04/2010 - 14:33.

Some of the things you bring up haven't been ironed out yet. We just posted all this edition content though, and I'm working on ways of linking it together better online.

You can see the articles in the table of contents on the right, but I think the "package" feel of the edition may not be as strong as it is in print. For example, this article is about what happened in Chicago. There's limited space in print in each article to get into all the issues that are covered elsewhere in the edition. Online though, we have unlimited space and can add hyperlinks, but here our biggest hurdle is probably just the time it takes to do more visible linking between the pieces. If you have any suggestions on how we can do a better job, do tell! Thanks.

Submitted by dkbog (not verified) on Thu, 02/04/2010 - 14:45.

You could do a better job of gathering all of the facts and not making the article like, "Oh My everyone thinks this Renaissance School thing is so great". Reading it, it looks a little one-sided. The model did not work in Chicago--Why would people waste taxpayer dollars for yet another plan to help our schools??
Do you realize how many models have been used in this District that are a waste??
Until parents show more interest in their children's lives and support Education fully, no matter how many models and teachers you change out, the results will be the same--Test scores will not be high enough.
What happened to reduced class size??? Jerry Jordan forgot about that one.

Submitted by Erika Owens on Thu, 02/04/2010 - 14:54.

 Again, I think something that's getting lost here is all of the other articles in our edition. This piece is all about what's already been tried in the District. And you mention class size, also covered in the edition. Our editions are organized around a theme and have several articles about that topic so that you can get a thorough look at the issue. We're working on how to make these connections more clear online. 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Table of Contents

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

 

Philly Ed Feed

Top

Public School Notebook

3721 Midvale Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19129
Phone: (215) 951-0330, ext. 2107
Fax: (215) 951-0342
notebook@thenotebook.org

© Copyright 2012 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy