A quality teacher in every classroom: A dream deferred?
by Dale Mezzacappa and Ron Whitehorne
Despite pressure from No Child Left Behind, changes in the teachers’ contract, some incentives, and a “Campaign for Human Capital,” the School District has been unable to solve one problem that is a big contributor to the academic achievement gap: how to put a high quality teacher in every classroom.
A 2007 report from Research for Action (RFA) cited some improvements over prior years, including a wider applicant pool and significantly reduced reliance on “emergency-certified” teachers. However, the report noted that some racially isolated and high-poverty schools still labor with inexperienced staff, many vacancies, and high teacher turnover.
This fall the District also saw its worst vacancy rate in years, opening in September with more than 160 and carrying 120 into November. Most of those were in low-performing schools serving high concentrations of students of color. Pepper Middle School in Southwest Philadelphia listed nine vacancies in November.
“I think the vacancy issue is crucial to the achievement gap,” said Betsey Useem, who co-authored the RFA report.
Other cities made progress
A mid-November study released by the Center for Policy Research in Education detailed how big cities like New York, Boston, and Chicago had virtually eliminated teacher vacancies through more efficient hiring and compromises with their unions.
“Large urban districts have no excuse for opening school with many teacher and principal vacancies,” said Allan Odden, one of the authors of the report.
Superintendent Arlene Ackerman has vowed to tackle teacher quality along with many other issues that contribute to the achievement gap. On Nov. 19, she appointed Estelle Matthews of Wachovia chief talent development officer, but crucial hiring months went by without a permanent human resources director.
Ackerman has blamed parts of the union contract for the slow pace of teacher hiring and said she would seek relief from state regulations that make it difficult for terachers with out-of-state credentials to work in Philadelphia. The District and PFT are negotiating a new long-term contract this year.
The current contract guarantees the right of senior teachers to claim vacancies before new hires are placed.
In each of the last two summers, administrative decisions created situations in which veteran teachers exercised their right to choose new positions, grinding the hiring of new teachers to a halt.
In 2007, the School Reform Commission added 130 teaching jobs to reduce class size, creating last-minute openings in many schools. This year, Ackerman eliminated the jobs of more than 200 academic coaches, who then had to pick schools before new teachers could be hired. In both years, vacancies then spiked.
But contract changes alone don’t guarantee improvement. In 2004, the union made some concessions regarding so-called “site selection,” agreeing that for about half of openings principals could interview teacher candidates rather than simply accept the most senior teacher with the right credentials. However, it appears that this change has not resulted in more equitable distribution of high-quality, experienced teachers.
“We hear that some schools in the Northeast get hundreds of applications, while others get no applications,” Useem said. “But there has been no tracking of information.”
Teacher quality matters
The importance of teacher effectiveness has been backed by studies. Researchers at the University of Tennessee showed that, among students who began on the same level, those who then had high quality teachers for three years scored 50 percentage points higher than students who had three years of mediocre teachers, with the most benefit going to lower-achieving students.







Comments (2)
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/15/2010 - 12:03.
Get real with the teaching profession.
Nothing in going to a teacher's college and getting a teaching certificate actually prepares any adult without a lot of social and cultural experience and wisdom and maturity, to take a diverse group of kids and move them into motivated learning and manage a class room.
The best potential employees are cut out of the running for teaching by Union and tenure rules, certification stupidity, and credential demands coupled with poor pay. The benefits, on the other hand, are much better than industry, resulting on unqualified teachers handing on until they gain tenure, and then letting the unions keep them employed.
Teaching has become merely a job for basically unchallenged young women, and a few men.
It has not respect, as the teachers hold themselves out of the community and above the parents....not a participant, but a paternalistic parent substitute protected by law, the ACLU, and the Unions.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/15/2010 - 12:34.
Here we go again with the same, old played out stereotypes. Just how is it that UNIONS are stopping the "best potential employees" from teaching? Just how would tenure be one of the causes that prevents them FROM teaching?
"unchallenged young women and a few men", you must be joking. There are few jobs that are as challenging as teaching. How do you know that "teachers hold themselves out of the communitry anbd above the parents"? What is it that you do for a living besides post anti-union propaganda? Many teachers are more of the a participant in their students' lives than their actual parents. You sound like someone who couldn't make it in the classroom and wants to dis teachers as a group. Maybe you need to find a few challenges of your own before posting wholesale stereotypes of teachers.
In many classrooms in Philly these is little diversity. As we saw with South Philly High the administration, currently in place, has trouble dealing with true diversity.
Post new comment