Menu
Paid Advertisement
view counter

Funding the plan: a big "if"

The mayor’s Chief Education Officer Lori Shorr, has told the Notebook she has been assured by District Chief Business Officer Michael Masch that the District can afford to implement the Imagine 2014 plan “if we have adequacy in state funding.” She and the mayor are supporting approval of the plan.

But that’s a big “if.”

The Pennsylvania legislature adopted a historic commitment last year to follow a formula to achieve adequate funding for all school districts within six years. The premise of the state’s adequacy formula is that by 2014, Philadelphia will be getting $600 million more annually in education aid from the state than it received last year, according to figures from the Pennsylvania Department of Education.

Shorr’s conditional statement appears to support rumblings that the annual cost of the Imagine 2014 plan is far greater than the $50 or $60 million aggregate figures cited until recently by Superintendent Ackerman. At last week’s SRC meeting, she offered a figure of $160 million but then retracted it, saying she wasn’t sure what it included.

Since then, District officials have declined to put an overall price tag on the initiatives in Imagine 2014.

“The estimated first-year cost of implementation of Imagine 2014 will be revealed on Wednesday,” spokesperson Vincent Thompson said. (Note no promise of a five-year figure.)

Thompson also said that the District is “still working on responding to the Notebook’s request” for an external analysis by Public Financial Management about the costs of the plan. The Notebook requested a copy of that analysis April 16.

The District’s lump sum budget for 2009-10 assumes the availability of about $300 million more than last year, a massive revenue increase made possible by a one-time infusion of federal stimulus funds from several different streams. That should leave a lot of room for strategic plan initiatives.

Whether the state will be able to maintain its level of funding for the School District in future years in the face of the sharpest economic downturn since the Great Depression is uncertain. The adequacy formula would require the state to not only maintain this year’s increased level of basic education funding, but to come up with hundreds of millions in additional education funding in the subsequent four years. Unfortunately, the state’s adequacy formula does not include a plan for how those funds will be raised.

A Notebook analysis in March of the initial draft plan, predicting that it may exceed Ackerman’s initial estimate of “$50 million over five years,” pointed to items like class size reduction, expansion of guidance counselors, and implementation of the Reading Recovery program in elementary grades that would each likely cost in the tens of millions annually.

Many other items in the plan appear likely to have substantial price tags, including putting art and music in every elementary school, opening three new Career and Technical high schools, implementing an early warning indicator system at all grade levels for dropout prevention, and implementing three or five-day summer orientations for all kindergartners, sixth- and ninth-graders.

District officials have offered only that they have been working furiously for weeks on pricing out the individual items.

A letter from Parents United for Public Education to the four School Reform Commission members cited budget concerns in calling for a postponement of the scheduled April 22 vote on the strategic plan. “We have deep concerns about the lack of clarity within the plan specifically around priorities, a clear roadmap with benchmarks and intermediate goals, and a realistic budget,” the letter said. “In our experience, these are the exact reasons why the School District’s history is often littered with failed projects that started with great intent.”

Ackerman has often said in presenting her massive list of reforms and initiatives that she doesn’t believe money should be the issue – that Philadelphia students lack even the basics and her list comprises what they need. Shorr agreed that the District has been a victim of “horrible underfunding.” It would be hard to find an advocate that disagrees.

But it’s likely this school system is going to continue to have to make hard choices. Before adopting this as a roadmap for the next five years, the public – like the SRC – is owed more solid information about the full cost of Imagine 2014 and all its components.

view counter

Comments (2)

Submitted by Helen Gym on April 22, 2009 12:38 am

It's certainly a rather ironic position we're in. A little more than a decade ago, education advocates cheered then Superintendent David Hornbeck for laying down the gauntlet and saying he refused to abide by the pathetic amounts of money allotted the District.

But today we're in a different place in different times. Since the state takeover, the District has arguably seen a significant infusion of dollars and made costly decisions on how to use that money. The next two years may see an unprecedented amount of cash if federal stimulus dollars are combined with a continued state commitment to the costing out study. While there's still acknowledgement of the underfunding of the District, parents and community members have become more savvy and skeptical about making sure those dollars are used wisely. We've seen money go down the tubes for expenditures unheard of in the Hornbeck years, tens of millions of dollars for private contracts, no bid contracts, administrative salaries, special assistants, etc. Meanwhile school-based resources have largely declined over this same period.

I don't think there's any question the District both needs and deserves more cash. But as parents, our first consideration is that as we fight for more resources we must also hold the District accountable for properly allocating the money we have and reallocating monies away from particular entitlements that have become political legacies in this district.

Submitted by Paul Socolar on April 22, 2009 12:26 am

Times do change. Based on Lori Shorr's comments, it sounds like the budgeting for the strategic plan assumes that by year 5 of the plan, the District will have all the adequacy funds, an extra $500 million or so annually in state aid to work with.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. We reserve the right to delete or remove any material deemed to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Please see our "Terms of Usage" for more detail concerning your obligations as a user of this service. Reader comments are limited to 500 words. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Follow Us On

Read the latest print issue

 

Philly Ed Feed

Become a Notebook member

 

Recent Comments

Top

Public School Notebook

699 Ranstead St.
Third Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: (215) 839-0082
Fax: (215) 238-2300
notebook@thenotebook.org

© Copyright 2013 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy