As a recently retired School District principal with an insider’s perspective on school reform efforts for the last 17 years, I am happy to be offered the opportunity to join the Notebook's roll of bloggers. I believe that in a modest way I can provide a more nuanced and realistic perspective regarding the challenges and successes of public education than what has often been characterized in the media in recent times.
My career as an educator has been rooted in the belief that the work of a teacher is a vital public service. I am an unabashed supporter of public education. I see our public schools as the means through which we support our children in developing the skills that will assist them to be successful and productive adults. Further, I see our schools as community centers that unify us as a people and prepare our children to be active and responsible citizens of our democratic society. I believe that school based K-12 educators need to speak out on the issues that confront us.
I have been a educator for 36 years and principal of Meade Elementary School for 12.5 years. Before taking leadership of Meade School, I was the assistant principal at the neighboring Vaux Middle School. Nearly half of my career has been spent in one North Philadelphia community learning much about the schooling of children who live in low-resourced neighborhoods.
The school turnaround advocates who currently dominate the NCLB school reform agenda claim that dramatic increases in student test performance can occur in a short period of one to two years. My years of experience as a school-based teacher and teacher leader have taught me that real educational change is a slow, complex, and sometimes grueling process. Yet it is one that has a much greater significance on the future successes of children than increasing test scores on a standardized test.
It is time to start to set the record straight about what it takes to achieve true measures of school reform. I look forward to fully and openly participating in the lively dialogue that the Notebook site generates.
Earlier this week the District announced a shift away from mandated, scripted curricula in favor of autonomy for individual schools. Over the past decade, the amount of autonomy a school has over its curriculum has repeatedly changed as the District leadership changes. Let's review that recent history.
This Saturday, the Save Our Schools March and National Call to Action will take place in Washington D.C. The rally, which will be staged at the ellipse, starts at noon. Around 1:30 p.m., participants will march to the White House where the demonstration will continue.
Many readers will recognize that most, if not all, of the issues that we regularly discuss in the comments of the Notebook blog are represented in the march's guiding principles.
The Inquirer’s recent series on school violence has sparked comment from many quarters. The response of Mayor Nutter and Police Commissioner Ramsey, in particular, has provoked some controversy. They have suggested that it might be time to place Philadelphia police officers in some of our more dangerous schools.
Jerry Jordan, president of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers was quoted as favoring this idea. Jordan cited his own experiences as a teacher at University City High School where at one time city police officers were assigned.
During its recent January planning meeting, District staffers presented a preliminary facilities usage report to the School Reform Commission. At this time, the SRC was informed that there are 70,000 vacant seats in the District’s schools. This was almost double the number quoted in an earlier report. In their PowerPoint presentation, staffers portrayed excess space in District schools as being greater than the number of seats in Lincoln Financial Field.
The staffers’ use of the term “vacant seats” to describe underutilized space is an interesting choice of words. Even more intriguing is how they compared this number to the amount of seating available at a football stadium.
In the 2011 school year and going forward, the probability that a major financial shortfall will cripple the operations of the School District of Philadelphia is increasingly becoming a certainty.
Circumstances beyond the control of the District’s money managers will soon significantly reduce the operational income needed to fund essential instructional programs.
In order to balance a much-diminished budget, it is likely that services will be slashed. These cuts will be deep. It may be necessary to increase class sizes, reduce staff, and close schools in order to cope with the impact of this impending crisis.
The NEWSFLASH, a free e-bulletin, provides timely stories and updates in between print editions of the Notebook.
I've never been so moved by a post.
3721 Midvale Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19129
Phone: (215) 951-0330, ext. 2107
Fax: (215) 951-0342
notebook@thenotebook.org
© Copyright 2010 The Philadelphia Public School Notebook. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy